[gentoo-dev] Offering nightly KDE CVS binary packages

[gentoo-dev] Offering nightly KDE CVS binary packages

[Timo A. Hummel]

Hi,

Dan Armak told me to offer my nightly KDE CVS builds here - he told me
that uploading them to ibiblio.org would be a nice thing. 

If people want these nightly KDE builds - which compile settings would
you prefer? I don't really care, since my box is fast enough to run even
not very well optimized packages. 

These builds will be made with gcc2.95.3, since I don't have a gcc3 box
yet (sorry).

Cheers,
Timo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Offering nightly KDE CVS binary packages

[Cedric Veilleux]

	I could provide gcc3 nightly builds for kde-cvs. I compile them already for 
my own needs. I'd be happy to upload them somewhere where they can be shared.


On September 23, 2002 03:53 am, Timo A. Hummel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dan Armak told me to offer my nightly KDE CVS builds here - he told me
> that uploading them to ibiblio.org would be a nice thing.
>
> If people want these nightly KDE builds - which compile settings would
> you prefer? I don't really care, since my box is fast enough to run even
> not very well optimized packages.
>
> These builds will be made with gcc2.95.3, since I don't have a gcc3 box
> yet (sorry).
>
> Cheers,
> Timo
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Offering nightly KDE CVS binary packages

[Emiel Kollof]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 23 September 2002 18:50, Cedric Veilleux wrote:
> I could provide gcc3 nightly builds for kde-cvs. I compile them already for
> my own needs. I'd be happy to upload them somewhere where they can be
> shared.

How about icc (the intel compiler) compiled KDE nightlies? Is that possible? 
It seems that icc compiled binaries are somewhat better optimized, and it 
even seems that way if I google long enough :)

Also, from what I've heard, the icc C++ implementation seems to be better than 
our own 'old faithful' g++. 

Or are there licensing issues in the way that prevent this to be possible?

Cheers,
Emiel
- -- 
To be great is to be misunderstood.
		-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9j2NvXhj4b9ZSY0oRAiAvAKCHCNrxfPY3hLZvaYdoOQTG3RbXfQCfdvyR
WQGjKtECQoSOVCPeZLkiQhM=
=QfrJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----