From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (warrior.services.quay.plus.net [212.159.14.227]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C0ADABD77 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 02:47:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 22088 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 07:47:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maya.thatproject.co.uk) (212.56.88.205) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Sep 2002 07:47:11 -0000 Received: by maya.thatproject.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4C01D275BBD; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:47:11 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Benj Organization: thatproject To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] License criteria for Gentoo Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:47:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200209230847.10229.ben@thatproject.co.uk> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 915c5c70-c6fb-4c49-ac48-07f3e286f3ea X-Archives-Hash: 74b2f941bd4dcbc5565f57be179f30eb On Sunday 22 September 2002 4:55 pm, Richard Stallman wrote: > (If you would call the system Gentoo GNU/Linux, that would help us > also. See http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html.) This was done to death on this list, with a whole range of opinions for a= nd=20 against. Wasn't the idea to include a USE variable of something, so tha= t=20 users could choose which to call it? Personally, it's Gentoo Linux, I'm=20 afraid that GNU neither rolls of the tounge, nor looks very good. Which = is=20 shallow, I know, but I don't think I'm alone...