From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_QUAR,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from oberon.geminidataloggers.com (oberon.geminidataloggers.com [194.200.199.163])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D26ABB4F
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:15:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from limburger.internal.geminidataloggers.com (limburger.internal.geminidataloggers.com [192.168.0.41])
	by oberon.geminidataloggers.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26657;
	Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:15:26 +0100
Received: from limburger (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by limburger.internal.geminidataloggers.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8IGFQ312287;
	Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:15:26 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com>
To: Burton Samograd <kruhft@kruhft.dyndns.org>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new gentoo-sources kernels (r5+)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:15:26 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
References: <20020918032411.GK4904@kruhft.dyndns.org> <3D87F8C9.5070003@charter.net> <20020918155206.GL4904@kruhft.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020918155206.GL4904@kruhft.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200209181715.26460.tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: b9e8e53c-d212-40cf-bbac-06ffeed0eb6c
X-Archives-Hash: 77676d795def2806455ae0bbc6f3dc15

On Wednesday 18 Sep 2002 4:52 pm, Burton Samograd wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:53:45PM -0400, tprado wrote:
> > It sounds like you're probably making a simple mistake somewhere in y=
our
> > kernel upgrade somewhere.
>
> Acutally, it turns out it was that fancy new GrSecurity setting (I had
> it set to med thinking that would be ok). =20

Ive seen that before. I also had alot of GrSecurity log messages mixed in=
 with=20
those error message, which gave a good clue about the cause of the proble=
m.=20
Did you not have that?

> Maybe someone could update
> the install docs saying to keep it at low or off, since gentoo doesn't
> seem to be able to work with it any higher.

I think my problems were caused by the extra chroot checks fouling on an=20
initrd boot environment. Everything worked fine once I turned on GrSecuri=
ty's=20
'use a sysctl' option, so all its extra checks are turned off at boot.