From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,
	DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from mailnews.kub.nl (mailnews.kub.nl [137.56.0.220])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF06AABAE5
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 07:41:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.sub.devrieze.net (gt0416.kub.nl [137.56.97.162])
	by mailnews.kub.nl (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8ECfkvA003871
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:41:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from pavlvs1.local.devrieze.net (pavlvs1.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.1])
	by mail.sub.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4E05BA
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:41:45 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking entire portage directories
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:41:44 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2
References: <20020912164028.GH5099@kruhft.dyndns.org> <3D810ADD.9060308@gentoo.org> <20020913153623.GA16963@kruhft.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020913153623.GA16963@kruhft.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200209141441.44471.pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 59ed2704-d8fe-46f9-bf6a-5fedaa5f91d5
X-Archives-Hash: 277d1730b6379ed326954222c3be0a3c

On Friday 13 September 2002 17:36, Burton Samograd wrote:
>
> So, since it doesn't seem to be possible to prune the portage tree,
> would there be any problems with sharing the directory with annother
> machine using NFS or something similar?
>

Only speed considerations are relevant. Those considerations have allread=
y=20
been relieved by the caching that is employed by the system.

--=20
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net