From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from home2.telefragged.com (unknown [209.189.226.12]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5004AAC74F for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:28:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (gw2.ofw.fi [194.111.144.2]) by home2.telefragged.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g7HJURr07138 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:30:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 21:32:36 +0300 From: Dan Naumov To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. Message-Id: <20020817213236.40ae8232.jago@telefragged.com> In-Reply-To: <00fb01c24619$b53ebe70$0200a8c0@vapier> References: <20020817190905.66977331.jago@telefragged.com> <20020817163037.GA6497@jackpot.localdomain> <200208171850.29925.verwilst@gentoo.org> <20020817200303.4ebd74ab.jago@telefragged.com> <00fb01c24619$b53ebe70$0200a8c0@vapier> Organization: Home X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.1claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 0ca14fed-2263-4213-b824-8dc6329b722a X-Archives-Hash: 309e12419933d7c0b85af30d5d196dd9 On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:12:54 -0400 "mike" wrote: > this was a known issue when the ebuild made (i made it ;]) > but the solution was to grab a stable-ish build, make the digest > off of it, and post it to ibiblio. then, when the next stable-ish > version came along, a new digest would be put out and the > version be bumped up to -r1 and so on and so forth. the > problem lays with the fact that the last release of quakeforge > is like 0.3.0. this version is dead and majorly obsolete. > the 'newer' versions get put out when someone famil with > the project feels it is needed. also, that tar ball isnt auto-generated > every single hour ... not sure if it is even autogenerated ... > but yeah, i think the version should have had at least a > date tag on it now that you mention it. once i fix the > ebuild for gcc3.x ill post the new one with a date tag > -mike The 0.5.x CVS snapshots to which the ebuild links ARE automatically generated every hour. Ask on OPN #QuakeForge if you don't trust me. Dan Naumov aka Jago