From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.7 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,DMARC_NONE, DSN_NO_MIMEVERSION,FREEMAIL_FROM,LOTS_OF_MONEY,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MILLION_USD,MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,T_MONEY_PERCENT,T_US_DOLLARS_3, URG_BIZ autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from www.fastmail.fm (fastmail.fm [209.61.183.86]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7454CAC4F5 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from www.fastmail.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7CB6DAB8 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from server2.fastmail.fm (server2.internal [10.202.2.133]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502886DACE for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: by server2.fastmail.fm (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5594893868; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:30 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: multipart/report; boundary="_----------=_1029372390751850"; report-type="delivery-status" From: "Mail Delivery System" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20020815004630.5594893868@server2.fastmail.fm> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:30 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: ff9941c0-c4dd-43cb-b3fb-c8de20102f67 X-Archives-Hash: fd599d1694d599d4d15030d5f48cc51e This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_1029372390751850 Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain This is the Postfix program at host fastmail.fm. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix program : data format error. Command output: devx0000: Mailbox does not exist --_----------=_1029372390751850 Content-Description: Delivery error report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; fastmail.fm Arrival-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:46 AM Final-Recipient: rfc822; devx0000@fastmail.fm Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; data format error. Command output: devx0000: Mailbox does not exist --_----------=_1029372390751850 Content-Description: Undelivered Message Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Received: from www.fastmail.fm (server1.internal [10.202.2.132]) by server2.fastmail.fm (Cyrus v2.1.5) with LMTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:20:29 -0500 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from www.fastmail.fm (server1.internal [10.202.2.132]) by www.fastmail.fm (Cyrus v2.1.3) with LMTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:20:29 -0500 Received: from www.fastmail.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDBD6DA01 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:20:15 -0500 (CDT) X-Mail-from: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-Delivered-to: X-Spam-score: 9.4 X-Spam: spam SPAM: ---- Start SpamAssassin results SPAM: 9.4 hits, 5 required; SPAM: * 0.5 -- From: does not include a real name SPAM: * -0.7 -- BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody' SPAM: * 4.5 -- BODY: Nigerian scam key phrase SPAM: * 4.3 -- BODY: Mutated Nigerian scams, cf http://www.snopes2.com/inboxer/scams/nigeria.htm SPAM: * 2.3 -- BODY: Nigerian scam key phrase ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) SPAM: * 1.1 -- BODY: A word in all caps repeated on the line SPAM: * -3.1 -- BODY: Contains a PGP-signed message SPAM: * 0.5 -- Uses words and phrases which indicate porn (3) SPAM: SPAM: ---- End of SpamAssassin results Received: from wallace.eclinic.com.au (unknown [203.63.55.34]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with SMTP id 229D66DA2F for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:20:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 5599 invoked by uid 1008); 16 Jul 2002 14:20:00 -0000 Delivered-To: linuxgamers-dev@linuxgamers.net Received: (qmail 5595 invoked by uid 64014); 16 Jul 2002 14:19:59 -0000 Received: from gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org by wallace with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.00/v4126. . Clean. Processed in 4.0814 secs); 16 Jul 2002 14:19:59 -0000 Received: from chiba.3jane.net (nobody@64.57.168.198) by 203.63.55.34 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2002 14:19:55 -0000 Received: from chiba.3jane.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CCEAC64C; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:20:03 -0500 (CDT) From: gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org Subject: gentoo-dev digest, Vol 1 #411 - 14 msgs Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailer: Mailman v2.0.6 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Message-Id: <20020716142003.71CCEAC64C@chiba.3jane.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:20:03 -0500 (CDT) Send gentoo-dev mailing list submissions to gentoo-dev@gentoo.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org You can reach the person managing the list at gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of gentoo-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Unicode support (Marko Mikulicic) 2. gentoo-web. (Terje Kvernes) 3. orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request (Ben Lutgens) 4. RE: orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request (Doug Goldstein) 5. proposal (Respond Urgently) (Dr.Samson Osage) 6. Re: orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request (Chad M. Huneycutt) 7. Re: extremely important (Jake Bishop) 8. [gentoo-announce] More Moved Packages (dev-php) (Ryan Phillips) 9. about GLSA (Asbjorn Sannes) 10. problem with "emerge clean" (Matthias F. Brandstetter) 11. Re: Unicode support (Nils Decker) 12. Re: problem with "emerge clean" (Markus Wagner) 13. Re: problem with "emerge clean" (Jean-Michel Smith) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:06:10 +0200 From: Marko Mikulicic To: Christophe Vanfleteren Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unicode support Christophe Vanfleteren wrote: > On Tuesday 16 July 2002 01:37, Marko Mikulicic wrote: > <---> > >>PS: it would be nice if portage could maintain a list >>of possible use flags, based on ebuild files contents, with a brief >>description on each. > > > Try > cat /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc > > Christophe Vanfleteren > Yes, it does the job. But it has to be updated by hand. I mean something that scans the ebuilds when rsyncing, for example, which would list all use flags, including those added in new user submitted ebuild files. I'm not sure if it makes sense, just food for thoughts. Marko --__--__-- Message: 2 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Organization: do you Gentoo? From: Terje Kvernes Date: 16 Jul 2002 05:29:47 +0200 Subject: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-web. this ebuild should depend on cvs. I couldn't file a bugzilla report as I'm off to a holiday, and just grabbed gentoo-web to make sure I had more stuff to read. happy hacking people. -- Terje - off with --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:53:51 -0500 From: Ben Lutgens To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'd like to solicit your help in testing something to make sure I'm not losing my mind :-) I was getting this wierd thing where no matter what I did, i was getting no orinoco drivers compiled or installed. A little investigation showed me the following code in the wireless/Makefile in the toplevel of the source tree. ifdef DO_ORINOCO MODULES +=3D hermes.o orinoco.o orinoco_cs.o SRCS +=3D hermes.c orinoco.c orinoco_cs.c endif Thanks to this little nugget the only way to get these .o files to compile is by a -DDO_ORINOCO or commenting the ifdef and endif lines out. Some folks have said that 3.1.34-r7 doesn't have this problem, and they a simple "ebuild pcmcia-cs-3.1.34-r7.ebuild merge" would net you some orinoco drivers. I do not believe this. Here's how to test. cd ${PORTDIR}/sys-apps/pcmcia-cs ebuild pcmcia-cs-3.1.34-r7.ebuild clean unpack compile cd /var/tmp/portage/pcmcia-cs-3.1.34-r7/work/pcmcia-3.1.34/wireless/ ls *.o # you should see (if i'm not smoking something) airo.o netwave_cs.o wavelan_cs.o wvlan_hcf.o airo_cs.o ray_cs.o wvlan_cs.o wvlan_hcfio.o Now, to further complete our test we'll fire up our favorite text editor on the Makefile in the same dir as we're in, and comment out ifdef in line 21 and endif in line 24. Now if you run "make" you should see it compile some more modules. And another "ls *.o" and we see: airo.o hermes.o orinoco.o ray_cs.o wvlan_cs.o wvlan_hcfio= .o airo_cs.o netwave_cs.o orinoco_cs.o wavelan_cs.o wvlan_hcf.o Now, to make sure that I'm not a complete dolt, please give this test a once over to and post your findings in this thread just to make an old man feel better and that he isn't losing his mind. I could continue to test this with more and more versions of this package but according to some conversations I've had this particular one is supposed to have been proven to "compile and install the orinoco drivers" and since I see no modifications to Makefiles or any any passing of a -DDO_ORINOCO in any patches or sed statements I can only assume that ALL packages using 3.1.34 source are suceptible to the same wierdness. Thanks for your time, and may the schwartz be with you. --=20 Ben Lutgens | http://cvs.gentoo.org/~lamer/=09 Random Gentoo Developer | http://www.gentoo.org/ "I got a wife and kids too but you don't see me out here stealing Imperial Droids now do ya?" --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9M5jPEPToQXBhE0ERAnHSAKCCSkK15RNmOT/zTt+qNh3jdfXxoQCgmj3G QD6QBGFWuT2dQZLFAVsH5kI= =h065 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- --__--__-- Message: 4 Reply-To: From: "Doug Goldstein" To: "'Ben Lutgens'" , Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:39:06 -0400 Organization: Gentoo Linux I have without any changes to the Makefile or anything... just the straight up -r7 ebuild the following: airo.o airo_cs.o hermes.o netwave_cs.o orinoco.o orinoco_cs.o ray_cs.o wavelan_cs.o wvlan_cs.o wvlan_hcf.o wvlan_hcfio.o I have gcc-2.95 on my laptop. -Doug Goldstein Gentoo Laptop Developer http://www.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ -----Original Message----- From: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org] On Behalf Of Ben Lutgens Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:54 PM To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request I'd like to solicit your help in testing something to make sure I'm not losing my mind :-) I was getting this wierd thing where no matter what I did, i was getting no orinoco drivers compiled or installed. A little investigation showed me the following code in the wireless/Makefile in the toplevel of the source tree. ifdef DO_ORINOCO MODULES += hermes.o orinoco.o orinoco_cs.o SRCS += hermes.c orinoco.c orinoco_cs.c endif Thanks to this little nugget the only way to get these .o files to compile is by a -DDO_ORINOCO or commenting the ifdef and endif lines out. Some folks have said that 3.1.34-r7 doesn't have this problem, and they a simple "ebuild pcmcia-cs-3.1.34-r7.ebuild merge" would net you some orinoco drivers. I do not believe this. Here's how to test. cd ${PORTDIR}/sys-apps/pcmcia-cs ebuild pcmcia-cs-3.1.34-r7.ebuild clean unpack compile cd /var/tmp/portage/pcmcia-cs-3.1.34-r7/work/pcmcia-3.1.34/wireless/ ls *.o # you should see (if i'm not smoking something) airo.o netwave_cs.o wavelan_cs.o wvlan_hcf.o airo_cs.o ray_cs.o wvlan_cs.o wvlan_hcfio.o Now, to further complete our test we'll fire up our favorite text editor on the Makefile in the same dir as we're in, and comment out ifdef in line 21 and endif in line 24. Now if you run "make" you should see it compile some more modules. And another "ls *.o" and we see: airo.o hermes.o orinoco.o ray_cs.o wvlan_cs.o wvlan_hcfio.o airo_cs.o netwave_cs.o orinoco_cs.o wavelan_cs.o wvlan_hcf.o Now, to make sure that I'm not a complete dolt, please give this test a once over to and post your findings in this thread just to make an old man feel better and that he isn't losing his mind. I could continue to test this with more and more versions of this package but according to some conversations I've had this particular one is supposed to have been proven to "compile and install the orinoco drivers" and since I see no modifications to Makefiles or any any passing of a -DDO_ORINOCO in any patches or sed statements I can only assume that ALL packages using 3.1.34 source are suceptible to the same wierdness. Thanks for your time, and may the schwartz be with you. -- Ben Lutgens | http://cvs.gentoo.org/~lamer/ Random Gentoo Developer | http://www.gentoo.org/ "I got a wife and kids too but you don't see me out here stealing Imperial Droids now do ya?" --__--__-- Message: 5 From: "Dr.Samson Osage" Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:41:51 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] proposal (Respond Urgently) Dr. Zack Ego. Lagos-Nigeria. ATTN: President/Ceo REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE IN A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION I am contacting you based on information and esteem recommendation I received of you from a high ranking official in the commercial section of the Nigerian Chambers of Commerce and Industry who guaranteed your reliability and trustworthyness in business dealings. This business proposal I wish to intimate you with is of mutual benefit and it's success is entirely based on mutual trust, cooperation and a high level of confidentiality as regard this transaction. I am the Chairman of the contract Advisory Committee (CAC) of the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Works and Housing (FMWH). I am seeking your assistance to enable me transfer the sum of US$16,500,000.00 (Sixteen Million, Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) into your private/company account. The fund came about as a result of a contract awarded and executed on behalf of my Ministry the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing. The contract was supposed to be awarded to two foreign contractors to the tune of US$60,000,000.00 (Sixty Million United States Dollars). But in the course of negotiation, the contract was awarded to a Bulgarian contractor at the cost of US$43,500,000.00 (Forty-Three Million, Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) to my benefit unknown to the contractor. This contract has been satisfactorily executed and inspected as the Bulgarian firm is presently securing payment from my Ministry, where I am the Executive Director in-charge of all foreign contract payment approval. As a civil servant still in active government service, I am forbidden by law to operate an account outside the shores of Nigeria. Hence this message to you seeking your assistance so as to enable me present your private/company account details as a beneficiary of contractual claims alongside that of the Bulgarian contractor, to enable me transfer the difference of US$16,500,000.00 (Sixteen Million, Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) into your provided account. On actualisation, the fund will be disbursed as stated below. 1. 30% of the fund will be for you as beneficiary. 2. 10% for reimbursement to both parties for incidental expenses that may be incurred during the course of the transaction. 3. 60% of the fund will be for me which I intend to invest in your country with you as my partner. All logistics are in place and all modalities worked out for a smooth actualisation of the transaction within the next few working days of commencement. For further details as to the workability of this transaction. Thank you and God bless as I await your urgent response. Yours Sincerely, Dr. Zack Ego. Email:zackego22@euroseek.com --__--__-- Message: 6 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:57:37 -0400 From: "Chad M. Huneycutt" Reply-To: chadh@gentoo.org Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Cc: Ben Lutgens Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] orinoco drivers not compiling: Guinea Pig Tester Request Ben Lutgens wrote: > I'd like to solicit your help in testing something to make sure I'm not > losing my mind :-) > > I was getting this wierd thing where no matter what I did, i was getting no > orinoco drivers compiled or installed. A little investigation showed me the > following code in the wireless/Makefile in the toplevel of the source tree. > > ifdef DO_ORINOCO > MODULES += hermes.o orinoco.o orinoco_cs.o > SRCS += hermes.c orinoco.c orinoco_cs.c > endif Ben, I think you are just missing a couple kernel configuration options. If you take a look at the Configure script in the top-level pcmcia-cs source directory, you will see that DO_ORINOCO is set based on the following conditions (I didn't bother to fully track down the logic, but this should get you started): 1. (most likely) -- CONFIG_NET_RADIO is configured in your kernel's .config file. This is the "Wireless LAN (non-hamradio)" option in the "Network Device Support" submenu. 2. [ -r /proc/net/wireless ] 3. [ ! -r ${LINUX}/include/linux/wireless.h ] ; then CONFIG_NET_PCMCIA_RADIO=n fi (this indirectly turns DO_ORINOCO off) The first thing above is like the alsa procedure of enabling sound but not selecting any drivers. You have to configure the kernel for wireless/radio support, and then pcmcia-cs's configure script enables building of the orinoco modules. I hope that clears it up for you. -- Chad Huneycutt --__--__-- Message: 7 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:09:48 -0700 From: Jake Bishop Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] extremely important To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Grant Slater wrote: >South Africa is a very beautiful country! I am South African AND I use >gentoo! > >Anyone with power? Please hunt this shameless bastard down and have him >skinned alive! > >THIS IS A SCAM! The "Mr Peter Zuma" will ask for some money from you and >then he is never heard from again. > >First time I have seen "them" use South Africa as their "base." > >Thanks > Grant Slater > >PS: If it sounds to good to be true, it is! >PPS: Cape Town / South Africa is a VERY beautiful place! Come visit! We >can go L.U.G.ing > >On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, zuma peter wrote: > > > >>FROM: PETER ZUMA >>pet_zuma@yahoo.com >> >>pet_zuma@hotvoice.com >> >> >>STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT >> >>Dear Sir, >> >>I am Mr. Peter Zuma, a Native of Cape Town in South >>Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with the South >> >> This is a variation on the Nigerian scam that was around a few years ago, --__--__-- Message: 8 From: Ryan Phillips To: gentoo-announce@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:58:30 -0700 Subject: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-announce] More Moved Packages (dev-php) --=.C2rr5w18rtCcJ0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm happy to announce that the dev-php/ portage directory is now live. dev-php/php is a shell interpreter. dev-php/mod_php is the module for apache. dev-php/PEAR-* PEAR modules The old dev-lang/php is now obsolete and is now dev-php/mod_php If anyone finds any bugs, please assign them to me: rphillips at gentoo.org Regards, Ryan Phillips --=.C2rr5w18rtCcJ0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBPTPgOVBxA/+aEdQ1AQGieQf+M9/1xudM4lu/nXC78ZXDdVse9uOAlESp pv8TqE/+3T/JjbZDtEKdNp1eC/VcMIZ+qkfNosaddepAzv3LJiPewjNiEtSNSFAO MlWz6Gy+hdx/IEO7o2Kxl0LjBNcoXx/mrlyp4Kant84EiJgsSIN1KWRwiCR7MQfp bWX0ODo+baM7TSij4B1ZUkriZIA8pqDkl9RPIdoEskbvxYUfkYzXR2BwQymRIqCr AgzO2e44YvNknuhnfKrNttTA4h7GMo4KJU3M1j49jrdsPEx1LMYBNizoHq0JLezX 9DFm7zBjJ0ig3INzKf9Z+JZiMy5ol4mqlkY9bXi/eWOf+HSq2jL20g== =XqiE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.C2rr5w18rtCcJ0-- _______________________________________________ gentoo-announce mailing list gentoo-announce@gentoo.org http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-announce --__--__-- Message: 9 From: Asbjorn Sannes To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: 16 Jul 2002 10:54:56 +0200 Subject: [gentoo-dev] about GLSA In every GLSA they inform us of the steps to take to update the software, and it always goes something like this: emerge --clean rsync emerge emerge clean .. now, I wonder, .. isn't emerge prune a better way? Because most of the time emerge clean won't unmerge the old packages leaving (very unlikely) vulnerable files? Examples of this behaviour (not unmerging the old vuln. package) is the recent glibc and openssh updates. Altough, in these cases it is not exploitable in the future it might be. -- Asbjorn Sannes ace@sannes.org --__--__-- Message: 10 From: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" Organization: tele.ring To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:15:33 +0200 Subject: [gentoo-dev] problem with "emerge clean" Hi gentoo-team! After a long search for a good linux dist. _without_ this sucking RPMs, I= =20 found your dist. on "distrowatch.com". I am very happy now, I like your=20 portage-system very much. But now I have my first problem with it. I tried to make an "emerge clean= "=20 which worked find, until it came to a package named=20 "kde-base/arts-1.0.1.20020604". Portage is not able to unmerge it with it= s=20 dependecies. Even if I try to unmerge it manually, I get the follwing=20 error message: >>> Unmerging kde-base/arts-1.0.1.20020604... !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully. !!! Function inherit, Line -2050, Exitcode 0 !!! kde.org: Error: unrecognized version 1.0.1, could not set SRC_URI !!! pkg_prerm() script failed; exiting. Because I'm new to your gentoo-system, I have no clue how to fix this=20 problem. Is there an easy way to fix it? Please help me! Thank you, Matthias --__--__-- Message: 11 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:23:35 +0200 From: Nils Decker To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unicode support Marko Mikulicic wrote: > Christophe Vanfleteren wrote: > > cat /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc > Yes, it does the job. But it has to be updated by hand. > I mean something that scans the ebuilds when rsyncing, try useflag from app-admin/gentoolkit Regards Nils -- Nils Decker --__--__-- Message: 12 From: Markus Wagner To: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] problem with "emerge clean" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:30:12 +0200 Hi! > error message: > >>> Unmerging kde-base/arts-1.0.1.20020604... > > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully. > !!! Function inherit, Line -2050, Exitcode 0 > !!! kde.org: Error: unrecognized version 1.0.1, could not set SRC_URI > > !!! pkg_prerm() script failed; exiting. Sorry, I still don't know how to fix this, but I have exactly the same pr= oblem=20 here with unmerging arts-1.0.2. I think there's a problem with the versio= n of=20 arts, because it's the only part of kde with a version different to 3.0.x= =2E Markus --__--__-- Message: 13 From: Jean-Michel Smith To: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] problem with "emerge clean" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:21:07 -0500 On Tuesday 16 July 2002 06:15 am, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote: > But now I have my first problem with it. I tried to make an "emerge cle= an" > which worked find, until it came to a package named > "kde-base/arts-1.0.1.20020604". Portage is not able to unmerge it with = its > dependecies. Even if I try to unmerge it manually, I get the follwing > > error message: > >>> Unmerging kde-base/arts-1.0.1.20020604... > > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully. > !!! Function inherit, Line -2050, Exitcode 0 > !!! kde.org: Error: unrecognized version 1.0.1, could not set SRC_URI > > !!! pkg_prerm() script failed; exiting. > > Because I'm new to your gentoo-system, I have no clue how to fix this > problem. Is there an easy way to fix it? Please help me! I'm having some rather serious difficulties that I think go back to emerg= e=20 rsync --clean as well (=09or maybe emerge -c, I don't know). In any even= t,=20 after following the instructions for the latest security update (to rebui= ld=20 glibc) and the juggled net-misc files, I've ended up with an emerge (port= age=20 2.0.13) which is severely broken, to the point where, if I just try and d= o an=20 'emerge -s [somepackage]' I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 1198, in ? searchinstance.output() File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 162, in output print "[ Results for search key : "+white(self.searchkey)+" ]" NameError: global name 'white' is not defined Pretty much every other action is also broken ... if I emerge something=20 directly it will merge, but of course, the moment it tries to print any k= ind=20 of message the same tracebacks occur. Anyone know how to fix this?! Jean. --__--__-- _______________________________________________ gentoo-dev mailing list gentoo-dev@gentoo.org http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev End of gentoo-dev Digest --_----------=_1029372390751850--