[gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Ryan Phillips]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]

I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the portage
tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and the source needs to
be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile correctly (atleast on my machine).

Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I haven't tested it),
and PPC needs to be tested.  If anyone finds any bugs, please open a bug report
and direct it to my attention.

As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included into this version of
povray.  I have disabled it by default (/etc/povray.conf).  Is this wise?

Regards,
Ryan Phillips
rphillips at gentoo dot org

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Jonathan Kelly]

On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the
> portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and
> the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile
> correctly (atleast on my machine).
> 
> Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I haven't
> tested it), and PPC needs to be tested.  If anyone finds any bugs,
> please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
> 
> As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included into
> this version of povray.  I have disabled it by default
> (/etc/povray.conf).  Is this wise?

I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact that
the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it downloads
povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart operation from
ftp.povray.org

Cheers.
Jonathan Kelly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Rigo]

Same here... ( See Bug No. 5956)

Rigo

Op ma 05-08-2002, om 08:12 schreef Jonathan Kelly:
> On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
> Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the
> > portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and
> > the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile
> > correctly (atleast on my machine).
> > 
> > Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I haven't
> > tested it), and PPC needs to be tested.  If anyone finds any bugs,
> > please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
> > 
> > As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included into
> > this version of povray.  I have disabled it by default
> > (/etc/povray.conf).  Is this wise?
> 
> I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact that
> the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it downloads
> povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart operation from
> ftp.povray.org
> 
> Cheers.
> Jonathan Kelly.
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Ryan Phillips]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1312 bytes --]

* Rigo <rigo@home.nl> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
> Same here... ( See Bug No. 5956)
> 
> Rigo
> 
> Op ma 05-08-2002, om 08:12 schreef Jonathan Kelly:
> > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
> > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the
> > > portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and
> > > the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile
> > > correctly (atleast on my machine).
> > > 
> > > Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I haven't
> > > tested it), and PPC needs to be tested.  If anyone finds any bugs,
> > > please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
> > > 
> > > As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included into
> > > this version of povray.  I have disabled it by default
> > > (/etc/povray.conf).  Is this wise?
> > 
> > I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact that
> > the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it downloads
> > povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart operation from
> > ftp.povray.org
> > 

Ibiblio wasn't synced correctly... The file should be around 6 MB and 
should be ok to download from ibilio now.

-ryan

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Rigo]

 * Installing configuration files
 * *Warning* I/O Security disabled by default
 *           Check /etc/povray.conf to enable
>>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
>>> media-gfx/povray-3.50a merged.

;) !


Op ma 05-08-2002, om 19:17 schreef Ryan Phillips:
> * Rigo <rigo@home.nl> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
> > Same here... ( See Bug No. 5956)
> > 
> > Rigo
> > 
> > Op ma 05-08-2002, om 08:12 schreef Jonathan Kelly:
> > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
> > > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the
> > > > portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and
> > > > the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile
> > > > correctly (atleast on my machine).
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I haven't
> > > > tested it), and PPC needs to be tested.  If anyone finds any bugs,
> > > > please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
> > > > 
> > > > As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included into
> > > > this version of povray.  I have disabled it by default
> > > > (/etc/povray.conf).  Is this wise?
> > > 
> > > I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact that
> > > the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it downloads
> > > povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart operation from
> > > ftp.povray.org
> > > 
> 
> Ibiblio wasn't synced correctly... The file should be around 6 MB and 
> should be ok to download from ibilio now.
> 
> -ryan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Jonathan Kelly]

On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:17:54 -0700
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:

> * Rigo <rigo@home.nl> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
> > Same here... ( See Bug No. 5956)
> > 
> > Rigo
> > 
> > Op ma 05-08-2002, om 08:12 schreef Jonathan Kelly:
> > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
> > > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into
> > > > the portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf
> > > > system, and the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it
> > > > to compile correctly (atleast on my machine).
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I
> > > > haven't tested it), and PPC needs to be tested.  If anyone finds
> > > > any bugs, please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
> > > > 
> > > > As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included
> > > > into this version of povray.  I have disabled it by default
> > > > (/etc/povray.conf).  Is this wise?
> > > 
> > > I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact
> > > that the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it
> > > downloads povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart
> > > operation from ftp.povray.org
> > > 
> 
> Ibiblio wasn't synced correctly... The file should be around 6 MB and 
> should be ok to download from ibilio now.
> 

Does this mean you can't downgrade to 3.1g as the filenames are the same?
Has anyone politely complained about the tarballs not including a version
number??

Cheers.
Jonathan Kelly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Jonathan Kelly]

On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the
> portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and
> the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile
> correctly (atleast on my machine).
> 
I'm getting this error on compiling ...
 <snip>
g++ -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DPOV_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/povray-3.5\"
-DCOMPILER_VER=\".Linux.gcc\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"   -march=i686 -O3
-pipe  -finline-functions -ffast-math  -ansi -c   `if [ "Xgcc" = "Xgcc" ];
then echo "-Wno-multichar"; fi ` -c file_pov.cpp
express.cpp: In function `void Parse_Num_Factor(double *, int *)':
express.cpp:724: implicit declaration of function `int acosh(...)'
express.cpp:727: implicit declaration of function `int asinh(...)'
express.cpp:730: implicit declaration of function `int atanh(...)'
express.cpp:1023: warning: assignment to `int' from `double'
g++ -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DPOV_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/povray-3.5\"
-DCOMPILER_VER=\".Linux.gcc\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"   -march=i686 -O3
-pipe  -finline-functions -ffast-math  -ansi -c   `if [ "Xgcc" = "Xgcc" ];
then echo "-Wno-multichar"; fi ` -c fncode.cpp
make: *** [express.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 90, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)

!!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/media-gfx/povray/povray-3.50a.ebuild
.

Cheers.
Jonathan Kelly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Jonathan Kelly]

On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 08:32:50 -0700
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:

> * Jonathan Kelly <j0n@tpg.com.au> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
> > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
> > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into
> > > the portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf
> > > system, and the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to
> > > compile correctly (atleast on my machine).
> > > 
> > I'm getting this error on compiling ...
> >  <snip>
> > g++ -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DPOV_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/povray-3.5\"
> > -DCOMPILER_VER=\".Linux.gcc\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"   -march=i686 -O3
> > -pipe  -finline-functions -ffast-math  -ansi -c   `if [ "Xgcc" =
> > "Xgcc" ]; then echo "-Wno-multichar"; fi ` -c file_pov.cpp
> > express.cpp: In function `void Parse_Num_Factor(double *, int *)':
> > express.cpp:724: implicit declaration of function `int acosh(...)'
> > express.cpp:727: implicit declaration of function `int asinh(...)'
> > express.cpp:730: implicit declaration of function `int atanh(...)'
> > express.cpp:1023: warning: assignment to `int' from `double'
> > g++ -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DPOV_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/povray-3.5\"
> > -DCOMPILER_VER=\".Linux.gcc\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"   -march=i686 -O3
> > -pipe  -finline-functions -ffast-math  -ansi -c   `if [ "Xgcc" =
> > "Xgcc" ]; then echo "-Wno-multichar"; fi ` -c fncode.cpp
> > make: *** [express.o] Error 1
> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > 
> > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
> > !!! Function src_compile, Line 90, Exitcode 2
> > !!! (no error message)
> > 
> > !!! emerge aborting on 
> > /usr/portage/media-gfx/povray/povray-3.50a.ebuild.
> > 
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
>  which version of gcc and USE flags?
> 
>  -ryan
> 

I'm using 2.95.3-r7

I found the problem ... I removed the -ansi from CPPFLAGS in the ebuild
script and it compiled.

Could I also suggest you remove the -static from LDFLAGS?

Cheers.
Jonathan Kelly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing

[Ryan Phillips]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2229 bytes --]

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:51:10 +1000
Jonathan Kelly <j0n@tpg.com.au> wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 08:32:50 -0700
> Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > * Jonathan Kelly <j0n@tpg.com.au> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
> > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
> > > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into
> > > > the portage tree.  Povray's package has changed to an autoconf
> > > > system, and the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to
> > > > compile correctly (atleast on my machine).
> > > > 
> > > I'm getting this error on compiling ...
> > >  <snip>
> > > g++ -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DPOV_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/povray-3.5\"
> > > -DCOMPILER_VER=\".Linux.gcc\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"   -march=i686 -O3
> > > -pipe  -finline-functions -ffast-math  -ansi -c   `if [ "Xgcc" =
> > > "Xgcc" ]; then echo "-Wno-multichar"; fi ` -c file_pov.cpp
> > > express.cpp: In function `void Parse_Num_Factor(double *, int *)':
> > > express.cpp:724: implicit declaration of function `int acosh(...)'
> > > express.cpp:727: implicit declaration of function `int asinh(...)'
> > > express.cpp:730: implicit declaration of function `int atanh(...)'
> > > express.cpp:1023: warning: assignment to `int' from `double'
> > > g++ -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DPOV_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/povray-3.5\"
> > > -DCOMPILER_VER=\".Linux.gcc\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"   -march=i686 -O3
> > > -pipe  -finline-functions -ffast-math  -ansi -c   `if [ "Xgcc" =
> > > "Xgcc" ]; then echo "-Wno-multichar"; fi ` -c fncode.cpp
> > > make: *** [express.o] Error 1
> > > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > 
> > > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
> > > !!! Function src_compile, Line 90, Exitcode 2
> > > !!! (no error message)
> > > 
> > > !!! emerge aborting on 
> > > /usr/portage/media-gfx/povray/povray-3.50a.ebuild.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> >  which version of gcc and USE flags?
> > 
> >  -ryan
> > 
> 
> I'm using 2.95.3-r7
> 
> I found the problem ... I removed the -ansi from CPPFLAGS in the ebuild
> script and it compiled.
> 
> Could I also suggest you remove the -static from LDFLAGS?

This fix has been committed to CVS.

-ryan

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]