From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,DMARC_NONE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from taipan.mudshark.org (100.209-115-231-0.interbaun.com [209.115.231.100]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA50BAC77E for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:11:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dante.taipan.mudshark.org (dante.taipan.mudshark.org [192.168.1.2]) by taipan.mudshark.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FEA4F12; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:09:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dante.taipan.mudshark.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B4BA8D6869; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:05:36 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:05:36 -0600 From: Craig Joly To: Jean-Michel Smith Cc: Gentoo-dev Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo perffered File system Message-ID: <20020808140536.GA13915@dante.taipan.mudshark.org> References: <20020808041725.80852.qmail@web14309.mail.yahoo.com> <200208080821.02003.jsmith@kcco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208080821.02003.jsmith@kcco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: e3a2343b-506d-4edc-bfa7-a28c4124cd96 X-Archives-Hash: ecec89abb7451803b09273c969310cbf On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:21:02AM -0500, Jean-Michel Smith wrote: > On Wednesday 07 August 2002 11:17 pm, Shanon Loveridge wrote: > > I was wondering now that it doesn't look like XFS is > > the preffered filesystem to gentoo (Not in gentoo > > sources and it doesn't look like it will go into the > > standard kernel) what is the preffered / recommended > > filesystem for gentoo? > > XFS is in gentoo-sources-r7 and works like a charm, as long as you do not turn > on kernel preemtion. > > Jean. Actually, I'm running XFS with kernel preemption on two machines and neither has given me any problems. Of course YMMV, don't use it on critical systems, yadda, yadda. Craig -- Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once.