From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from kruhft.dyndns.org (unknown [24.68.68.53]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33429AC523; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 04:10:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: by kruhft.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5E1233B3F; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 01:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 01:45:18 -0700 From: Burton Samograd To: Spider Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emacs segfaults Message-ID: <20020802084518.GA3720@kruhft.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Burton Samograd , Spider , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20020801203317.GB4695@kruhft.dyndns.org> <20020802022544.557bb506.spider@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020802022544.557bb506.spider@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 71154497-d1f2-46df-9272-33e985d1af72 X-Archives-Hash: b196be3661bec2e3cafdbdaf8ba623f4 I tried that and it didn't seem to make any difference...any other ideas? On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 02:25:44AM +0200, Spider wrote: > > > > begin quote > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:33:17 -0700 > Burton Samograd wrote: > > > I just did an update and now for some reason my emacs is segfaulting > > at startup. I've tried unmerging it and installing different versions > > with no luck. And, as luck would have it, the xemacs build script > > seems to have problems too. > > > > Here's an strace of emacs starting up: > > > > Give it a try without -funroll-loops. > it appears that mkennedy and carpaski came to the conclusion that this > was the bad flag today. > > not much, but it might help. > > //Spider > > > -- > begin .signature > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end