* Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies
2002-07-18 15:40 [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies Bastian Fuchs
@ 2002-07-18 16:28 ` Brandon Low
2002-07-18 16:55 ` Hannes Mehnert
2002-07-18 18:39 ` Jean-Michel Smith
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Low @ 2002-07-18 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bastian Fuchs; +Cc: gentoo-dev
Yes, portage2 will definitely have this support.
On Thu, 07/18/02 at 17:40:02 +0200, Bastian Fuchs wrote:
> Hello!
> Are there plans to add reverse dependencies in Portage, for example that
> emerge warns you, if you want to uninstall X, but KDE needs X.
>
> Thx for answer,
> Bastian
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies
2002-07-18 16:28 ` Brandon Low
@ 2002-07-18 16:55 ` Hannes Mehnert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Mehnert @ 2002-07-18 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Brandon Low; +Cc: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:28:21AM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
> Yes, portage2 will definitely have this support.
is there any schedule for portage2?
is there a feature list which features will be in portage2?
Hannes Mehnert
GPG-Fingerprint: B3BB E539 F6BF 6942 1492 3ACF 45CB 8D97 3881 8D1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9NvL5RcuNlziBjRwRAq4yAKCshktgoAFBC10+fLK8qwWFsieZGwCfarnv
8J3ov9NV1P970AzzYAnFLT4=
=X7tU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies
2002-07-18 15:40 [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies Bastian Fuchs
2002-07-18 16:28 ` Brandon Low
@ 2002-07-18 18:39 ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-07-18 18:47 ` Brandon Low
2002-07-18 18:48 ` Spider
2002-07-19 0:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mecho Puh
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Michel Smith @ 2002-07-18 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bastian Fuchs, gentoo-dev
On Thursday 18 July 2002 10:40 am, Bastian Fuchs wrote:
> Hello!
> Are there plans to add reverse dependencies in Portage, for example that
> emerge warns you, if you want to uninstall X, but KDE needs X.
The depends script, and 'qpkg -q' (gentoolkit) both give you this, at least in
as far as you can audit the reverse dependencies of the package you are about
to remove or 'clean'.
I find both useful; they present similar information, but in a different
format. qpkg -q is great for tracing out the reverse depends of a particular
package, while depends is great for getting an overall picture of what
packages are missing their dependencies, if any.
Jean.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies
2002-07-18 18:39 ` Jean-Michel Smith
@ 2002-07-18 18:47 ` Brandon Low
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Low @ 2002-07-18 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Just so yas know the depend script can be found at
http://gentoo.lostlogicx.com/depend Ssrit on IRC and myself wrote the
script, hopefully I'll get it into gentoolkit next week early. Let me
know about any bugs in qpkg -q or depend so I can fix them, thanks!
--Brandon
On Thu, 07/18/02 at 13:39:47 -0500, Jean-Michel Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 18 July 2002 10:40 am, Bastian Fuchs wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Are there plans to add reverse dependencies in Portage, for example that
> > emerge warns you, if you want to uninstall X, but KDE needs X.
>
> The depends script, and 'qpkg -q' (gentoolkit) both give you this, at least in
> as far as you can audit the reverse dependencies of the package you are about
> to remove or 'clean'.
>
> I find both useful; they present similar information, but in a different
> format. qpkg -q is great for tracing out the reverse depends of a particular
> package, while depends is great for getting an overall picture of what
> packages are missing their dependencies, if any.
>
> Jean.
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies
2002-07-18 15:40 [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies Bastian Fuchs
2002-07-18 16:28 ` Brandon Low
2002-07-18 18:39 ` Jean-Michel Smith
@ 2002-07-18 18:48 ` Spider
2002-07-19 0:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mecho Puh
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Spider @ 2002-07-18 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 514 bytes --]
begin quote
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:40:02 +0200
Bastian Fuchs <bastiaf@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello!
> Are there plans to add reverse dependencies in Portage, for example
> that emerge warns you, if you want to uninstall X, but KDE needs X.
>
It was in for a short while around 2.0.5 but was removed due to other
issues with it, but yes, its a planned feature.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Reverse Dependencies
2002-07-18 15:40 [gentoo-dev] Reverse Dependencies Bastian Fuchs
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-07-18 18:48 ` Spider
@ 2002-07-19 0:48 ` Mecho Puh
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mecho Puh @ 2002-07-19 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> Are there plans to add reverse dependencies in Portage, for example that
> emerge warns you, if you want to uninstall X, but KDE needs X.
http://gentoo.zhware.net/fuq.html#admin_sect4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread