From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from officepop3.tiscali.de (mxa.tiscali.de [194.162.162.215]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD5BAC5B9; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:34:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from naoko.kintaro.cx (unknown [62.144.144.134]) by officepop3.tiscali.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362995D07; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:33:57 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Kintaro Oe To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:30:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <20020710135201.955BEAC76B@chiba.3jane.net> In-Reply-To: <20020710135201.955BEAC76B@chiba.3jane.net> Cc: sandymac@gentoo.org X-What: is this?! X-Operating-System: Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200207101630.48263.iam@kintaro.cx> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev digest, Vol 1 #403 - 16 msgs Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 9269a747-12cd-42af-9a61-9f292660aa22 X-Archives-Hash: 2338ecab5edebf28bfa30d18d1225bc2 Am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 15:52 schrieb gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org: > Hi there. > Some questions on the rsync mirrors... Is anyone allowed to host it, > whatever bandwidth he can offer? > Especially the T-Dialin-IP (already posted by someone else to this list) > and the bulmalug.net/rsync1.uk.gentoo.org-Server with both 5!! max. > connections seem quite - useless... > In addition some hosts were down, but I don't know if they are down on a > regular base. > I'd suggest someone takes care foor the quality of these mirrors, since > they make up a great part of this distribution. If mirrors like this are > added to the round-robin I'm sure that most of the users start to > address single mirrors -> Makes the round-robin-balancing useless and > makes the load even worse on the "good" mirrors. > > sh-2.05a$ host rsync.gentoo.org > rsync.gentoo.org has address 64.246.42.103 no idea? > rsync.gentoo.org has address 128.193.4.3 > rsync.gentoo.org has address 217.229.53.126 T-Dialin? Huh? > rsync.gentoo.org has address 62.245.182.9 no idea? > rsync.gentoo.org has address 130.89.160.199 > ... Yes, i mailed this issue before to this list and two days ago I wrote to William McArthur (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/mirroring.html) about the DSL dialin that is used as a server ip for a rsync mirror. This ip was then removed. Well, this time another ip, but the same problem -> DSL dialin and some other hosts with no response. I think it is needed to set some requirements for rsync mirrors to be fullfilled before a new one is added to the list of rsync mirrors. Just my 0.02 euro˘ Greets /Andy -- eval \"echo -e `printf \"\\x066\\x055\\x063\\x06B \\x055\"`\" ;-)