From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from lostlogicx.com (host158.spe.iit.edu [198.37.27.158]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C894DAC6B5 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:08:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from lostlogic@localhost) by lostlogicx.com (8.11.4/8.11.2) id g5DA8f105837 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:08:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:08:41 -0500 From: Brandon Low To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Linux 1.3a Final Overview Message-ID: <20020613050841.B5557@lostlogicx.com> References: <200206131151.21867.verwilst@gentoo.org> <003501c212c1$1809f8d0$88f81c18@will> <200206131204.59419.verwilst@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200206131204.59419.verwilst@gentoo.org>; from verwilst@gentoo.org on Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:04:59PM +0200 X-Operating-System: Linux found 2.4.17-openmosix Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: a5039840-d2ef-4bd6-806a-c9ffbaab107f X-Archives-Hash: 79ae85e93d7f1f6aa18646d0693d4e65 On my 2 systems (one running gcc-3.0.4, slack and one gcc-3.1 gentoo) I have compiled X with a variety of -march opts and found no b0rkage, methinks you are good to go on this one. On Thu, 06/13/02 at 12:04:59 +0200, Bart Verwilst wrote: > On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:00, Will Johansson wrote: > || XFree86 doesn't compile right with athlon-tbird, keeps bringing up stuff > || about PEX, so I just exported FEATURES = "" and it worked fine. It > || compiles fine with others' with Athlon-XP. > If it worked with FEATURES="", then it was probable a sandbox bug.. > Since sandbox is disabled by default in 1.3x now, it's no longer a problem.. > No need to filter out the flag then out of XFree, right? > > Oh, on the sandbox, how's that coming along? > Azarah, i think it was you who had some python test sandbox thingy? > Any input there? > > || I haven't seen any other problem except that gcc ncurses thing that I > || found the bug, along with others, in #gentoo. > Yeah, already fixed this one with gcc 3.1 r6. > > Thanks! > > -- > Bart Verwilst > Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team > Gent, Belgium > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev