From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from vestibule.its.caltech.edu (vestibule.its.caltech.edu [131.215.48.17]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FDDAC3F4 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:19:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from groug.home.net (PPP-36-158.caltech.edu [131.215.36.158]) by vestibule.its.caltech.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5A6Hxk7008107 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:18:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" From: George Shapovalov To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] logging in portage Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:17:33 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <1023668825.8054.11.camel@tara.pvt.jagunco.net> In-Reply-To: <1023668825.8054.11.camel@tara.pvt.jagunco.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200206092317.33179.georges@its.caltech.edu> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 9c3cb781-8c92-4b81-a028-d423d6b51514 X-Archives-Hash: e9548fb1066811adaa864f2301ec9e32 Whats wrong with: emerge pkgname &>/some/place/repfile.rep ? It should be easy to call it inside the script you use to emerge packages= on=20 this server. If you desire to make reports on a per-package basis it shou= ld=20 be easy to create the script that would run emerge --pretend packagename=20 first and then call emerge for every reported package and capture reports= =20 separately... WTF incorporating this into portage itself: I did not see this mentioned=20 (though there were some related things suggested). If you think this is a= n=20 important addition please file a feature request to bugs.gentoo.org. George On Sunday 09 June 2002 17:27, Rufiao Valhacouto wrote: > In the process of creating a build server (a server which is capable of > building all the packages in the portage tree to test if a given profil= e > is broken, and maybe providing binary packages for people who desire > them) I've found it was required to have portage to be able to log the > [per package] ebuild output into a file (more likely in the /var/db/pkg= / > tree), so that it could be analyzed later. In fact, this behavior is > desirable generically, since it's sometimes useful to understand what > happened in the building process of a given package. Is this > functionality being planned for portage? Do you see any drawbacks to > include it in the mainstream code?