From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from amsfep12-int.chello.nl (amsfep12-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.17]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE91EAC3B6 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 14:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from die.chello.nl ([62.195.6.214]) by amsfep12-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with ESMTP id <20020609190418.PFTB14078.amsfep12-int.chello.nl@die.chello.nl> for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:04:18 +0200 Received: by die.chello.nl (Postfix, from userid 500) id 928BE14028E1; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:04:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:04:16 +0200 From: Magnus Therning To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugs that have been resolved? Message-ID: <20020609190416.GE3814@chello.nl> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20020608161747.GA5636@chello.nl> <200206081849.50649.danarmak@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="udcq9yAoWb9A4FsZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200206081849.50649.danarmak@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 70070180-d1bd-4969-8853-0561bf71b4e5 X-Archives-Hash: 5d0ba78823203c8c22ea9460dc6512e6 --udcq9yAoWb9A4FsZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Martin Schlemmer (azarah@gentoo.org) beat me to it :-) Geez, you guys are fast! /M On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 06:49:49PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: > On Saturday 08 June 2002 19:17, Magnus Therning wrote: > > What does one do in this situation? > > If one stumbles across a bug that seems to be resolved, but one isn't > > trusted to mark bugs as resolved in bugzilla. >=20 > Add a comment to the bug saying that it's resolved etc. and wait for the= =20 > asignee to close it. It will happen eventually, and open bugs for resolve= d=20 > problems aren't very problematic if their comments say that the problem i= s at=20 > least "apparently" resolved. >=20 > > > > I am referring to bugzilla bug 2100. > > > > /M >=20 > --=20 > Dan Armak > Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) > Matan, Israel >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >=20 --=20 Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0x6A83A7DF) magnus.therning@wanadoo.nl http://www.lysator.liu.se/~magus/ Don't comment bad code - rewrite it. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plaugher) --udcq9yAoWb9A4FsZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9A6aw/uA7GWqDp98RAsgdAJ9lu3759GKrO+9WDmZT1Sco7qiyHQCeO+Tz JQ00kvbGFgws3N1LL3MFkb4= =JLmb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --udcq9yAoWb9A4FsZ--