From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mxout3.netvision.net.il (mxout3.netvision.net.il [194.90.9.24]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF72ABD53 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:45:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from laptop.dan.net ([62.0.71.113]) by mxout3.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.3 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0GXE00CQIBQGO6@mxout3.netvision.net.il> for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2002 19:42:18 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 18:49:49 +0300 From: Dan Armak Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugs that have been resolved? In-reply-to: <20020608161747.GA5636@chello.nl> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-id: <200206081849.50649.danarmak@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <20020608161747.GA5636@chello.nl> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: danarmak@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 26735adc-b84c-4bf4-a781-c01716a18a0c X-Archives-Hash: 5489c14cdc8669929368552042d1f452 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 08 June 2002 19:17, Magnus Therning wrote: > What does one do in this situation? > If one stumbles across a bug that seems to be resolved, but one isn't > trusted to mark bugs as resolved in bugzilla. Add a comment to the bug saying that it's resolved etc. and wait for the asignee to close it. It will happen eventually, and open bugs for resolved problems aren't very problematic if their comments say that the problem is at least "apparently" resolved. > > I am referring to bugzilla bug 2100. > > /M - -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Matan, Israel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9AieeUI2RQ41fiVERAqEsAJ9rircGqb1lXOYRHPGP4Fr/OKfojgCdHgu4 9vrwOWmjkVMJvZL9cjZf5xk= =aN3x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----