From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mxout3.netvision.net.il (mxout3.netvision.net.il [194.90.9.24]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C266ABD53 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 04:59:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from laptop.dan.net ([62.0.71.113]) by mxout3.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.3 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0GXD00B08T3VPU@mxout3.netvision.net.il> for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2002 13:00:13 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 12:07:17 +0300 From: Dan Armak Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Optimized Qt In-reply-to: <117320000.1023524629@krabat.ahsoftware> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-id: <200206081207.22251.danarmak@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <117320000.1023524629@krabat.ahsoftware> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: danarmak@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 0f86e73a-3e3a-46b1-a12e-6d72a5e78761 X-Archives-Hash: 1d4a9e35a2cf4f961fd911b23284732d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Please see bug #1571. I haven't had time to "investigate" beyond what the comments say. If we could get a good rule of what CFLAGS work and what don't I'd be willing to itroduce the thing into the qt ebuilds. On Saturday 08 June 2002 11:23, Alexander Holler wrote: > Hello, > > --On Freitag, Juni 07, 2002 11:50:38 +0530 Prashanth Aditya Susarla > > wrote: > > Someone wanted to know if Qt compiled with higher optimization than its > > default was stable or not. I have just merged Qt compiled with > > -march=athlon-tbird -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mmmx -m3dnow > > (gcc-3.1, binutils-2.12.90.0.7, glibc-2.2.5-r4) and the emerge completed > > successfully. I am also working in my KDE now and there seem to be no > > breakages/crashes. > > Untar qt-copy-3.0.4.tar.bz2 and edit > > qt-copy-3.0.4/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf (it was linux-g++ in my case, > > it could be different for others) and re-archive the entire tree. Then > > ebuild qt-3.0.4-20020606-r1.ebuild digest would recompute the digests and > > one can proceed with the emerge. Obviously, this new digest file would be > > overwritten in the next emerge rsync. > > Good idea, maybe this could go into the next ebuild, here's a patch for the > actual ebuild: > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > --- qt-3.0.4.20020606-r1.ebuild.ori 2002-06-08 09:59:05.000000000 +0200 > +++ qt-3.0.4.20020606-r1.ebuild 2002-06-08 10:22:09.000000000 +0200 > @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ > cp configure configure.orig > sed -e 's:read acceptance:acceptance=yes:' \ > -e 's:|-repeater|:|-nas-sound|-repeater|:' configure.orig > > configure > + cp mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf.orig > + sed -e "s/-O2/${CFLAGS}/" mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf.orig > > mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf > > } > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > > > Regards, > > Alexander > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev - -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Matan, Israel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9AclJUI2RQ41fiVERAgtLAJ9cfL3CWk0li6TfoosljviGfbpwigCbBTei DZYflJdfuVVy7o/eED5nkvA= =l92L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----