From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,
	DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A726FAC3CC
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Jun 2002 04:14:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from callisto by pandora.cs.kun.nl
	via callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75] with ESMTP for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
	id g579EpC26982 (8.11.3/3.19); Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:14:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] inherit nowarn
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:14:51 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <20020607042727.04978bd7.spider@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020607042727.04978bd7.spider@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200206071114.51073.pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: bacdebbb-c595-43aa-a9fe-e3689ee6293a
X-Archives-Hash: 76a7d0129c80f6c057b66d5b600b53ed

On Friday 07 June 2002 04:27, Spider wrote:
>
> one way would be to add "-Wnoall" (not sure aobut this) and others woul=
d
> be to simply match "pedantic" "Wall" "Wdeprecated" and add a
> "Wno-deprecated" to kill all warnings.
>
> ideas on this approach please?

I like the second, if you mean to say that pedantic, Wall, etc will be de=
leted=20
from the build flags. Not using warnings is in normal cases a good thing =
(not=20
when it goes wrong). Maybe an option to put warnings on (not remove them)=
 in=20
ebuild would be apropriate for debugging.

Paul

--=20
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net