From: Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez <bass@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adapting webmin and usermin
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:02:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020605110251.47d15b11.bass@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1023248295.3037.57.camel@vindaloo.flat146>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2270 bytes --]
On 05 Jun 2002 04:38:14 +0100
Chris Davies <c.davies@cdavies.org> wrote:
|Hi,
|
|I've actually been doing just this for a couple of days now.. I'm not
|really ready to go public with the resulting patch and ebuild but I
|suppose this might be a good time to ask a few questions that come into
|my head.
|
|1) I am currently using the directory /opt/webmin as an installation
|dir. I appreciate that Gentoo wants to keep /opt for binaries only, and
|that webmin does not technically qualify as a binary distribution, but
I
|think it comes damn close. Does anyone agree/disagree with this view,
|and if you disagree, where should webmin go?
/opt is a good choice, but i think that it can be best /var
|2) SSL. Perl doesn't pay any attention to the ssl use flag as far as I
|am aware, so my strategy has been to have Perl grab the SSL module from
|CPAN if the use var is set, and then configure webmin with support for
|same. Again, comments? Suggestions?
well if you can use the USE variable cool :)
|3) What distribution should be chosen as a close approximation of
|Gentoo. I choose Redhat 7.2 as my first guess, and then later upgraded
|to .3 and I haven't noticed anything obviously broken, but extensive
|testing would be required before I'd let this anywhere near portage.
|Suggestions? Volunteers for testing? :)
i thinks that debian, slackware, o inclusive freebsd are more exact that
redhat
|4) I presumed that Webmin should not automatically be started on boot,
|that stuff should be handled by the user and whatever their preference
|of inetd or xinetd is, is this the correct approach?
you can do a simple script to do it
|5) License. Webmin uses a strange one, but not one that is restrictive.
|I presume it is OK just to add an entry in Gentoo's Lisencing dir
|specifically for Webmin and its kin.
yes, it can be usefull for others webmin products, like usermin.
when you finish with webmin, can be interesting adapt too usermin :)
contact with Maciek <maciek@borowka.net>, he wants to help :)
José Alberto Suárez López
--
<bass@gentoo.org>
<bass@adala.org>
<josealberto.suarez@hispalinux.es>
http://www.gentoo.org
http://www.adala.org
http://bass.dnsalias.com
http://gimp.es.gnome.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-04 22:05 [gentoo-dev] adapting webmin and usermin Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez
2002-06-04 22:22 ` Maciek Borowka
2002-06-05 3:38 ` Chris Davies
2002-06-05 9:02 ` Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez [this message]
2002-06-05 10:35 ` Chris Davies
2002-06-05 13:31 ` Joachim Blaabjerg
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Maciek Borowka
2002-06-05 22:11 ` Chris Davies
2002-06-06 17:08 ` Per Wigren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020605110251.47d15b11.bass@gentoo.org \
--to=bass@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox