From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,
	DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD316AC4BF
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue,  4 Jun 2002 08:08:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from callisto by pandora.cs.kun.nl
	via callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75] with ESMTP for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
	id g54D8MC07018 (8.11.3/3.19); Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:08:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive?
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:08:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <3CFCAD43.1020300@seul.org> <20020604152159.3fb59962.jago@telefragged.com> <3CFCB5C4.3060109@seul.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CFCB5C4.3060109@seul.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200206041508.22305.pauldv@cs.kun.nl>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 20a3dd17-4094-46bc-94c1-d85e393aa4c7
X-Archives-Hash: b6b4a8ced37de495142ca70f27b64557

On Tuesday 04 June 2002 14:42, Marko Mikulicic wrote:
> Dan Naumov wrote:
> > There is no real difference between an updated 1.1a system and a 1.2
> > system. Also, this problem with acroread is a known bug. Do a search =
for
> > it on Gentoo Bugzilla.
>
> Thank you. I cannot find the bug report.
> However I wish to know one thing:
>   "doins" will install its arguments. can it do it recursively, with
> some switch. Where can I find the sources of the "doins" function ?
>
> thanks,
>

/usr/lib/portage/bin/doins

Paul

ps the bug is allready resolved

--=20
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net