From: Spider <spider@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Xfree-4.2.0-r9
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 15:00:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020601150013.262896b5.spider@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206011140.18453.mmar@freenet.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2104 bytes --]
cd
//var/tmp/portage/xfree-4.2.0-r9/work/xc/programs/Xserver/PEX5/ddpex/mi
/level1
source /etc/make.conf
export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wall"
make
This will show you some more info on what went wrong.
but yes, I've reported it, though I don't like GNATS and probably didn't
get it all right...
//Spider
begin quote
On Sat, 01 Jun 2002 11:40:18 +0200
Marcel Martin <mmar@freenet.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2002 12:07, Jack Morgan wrote:
> > I'm having trouble compiling Xfree-4.2.0-r9. I've attached the tail
> > of the log. Any pointers would be appreciated.
>
> I had the same (or at least very similar) problem compiling
> xfree-4.2.0-r9 with gcc 3.1. I think doing one of the following helped
> me (don't remember very well...):
>
> - change your CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf to do less "agressive"
> optimizations. In my case, changing "-march=athlon -O3" to
> "-march=i686 -O3" worked. You might need to lower "-O3" as well. Then
> emerge the entire xfree again.
>
> - faster solution (that's what I did): go into the
> /var/tmp/portage/xfree-4.2.0-r9/work/xc/programs/Xserver/PEX5/ddpex/m
> i/level1 directory, then run make manually with a different CFLAGS
> setting. I suppose something in the line of
> make CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O2"
> should work. If this directory compiles successfully, you can then run
> ebuild /usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/xfree-4.2.0-r9.ebuild compile
> install \ qmerge
> (Should be in one line, but it's not because of automatic word-wrap.)
> This should compile the rest of xfree and install and merge it as
> "emerge" would have done.
>
> BTW: Has anyone reported the internal compiler error that's in Jack's
> logfiles?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> Hope I could help a bit,
> Marcel
> --
> . .
> / V / Marcel Martin Bielefeld
> \ \ mmar@freenet.de Germany
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-01 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-01 10:07 [gentoo-dev] Xfree-4.2.0-r9 Jack Morgan
2002-06-01 1:41 ` Spider
2002-06-01 9:40 ` Marcel Martin
2002-06-01 13:00 ` Spider [this message]
2002-06-02 22:14 ` Jack Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020601150013.262896b5.spider@gentoo.org \
--to=spider@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox