* [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
@ 2002-05-28 11:45 Matteo Sasso
2002-05-30 0:28 ` Ric Messier
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matteo Sasso @ 2002-05-28 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
I rsync'd lately but a 'emerge gcc -s' says my version of GCC (2.95.x) is the
latest available, even though there are many ebuilds in sys-devel/gcc such as
gcc-3.1.ebuild.
Why doesn't Portage see them? Is it because GCC>2.95 is not fully tested? How
can I override so that I can have both versions on my system?
Thank you very much.
--
icemaze@tiscalinet.it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
2002-05-28 11:45 [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1 Matteo Sasso
@ 2002-05-30 0:28 ` Ric Messier
2002-05-30 0:29 ` Christophe Vanfleteren
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ric Messier @ 2002-05-30 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Because you are using the wrong profile.
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
|> [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org] On Behalf Of Matteo Sasso
|> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:45 AM
|> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
|> Subject: [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
|>
|>
|> I rsync'd lately but a 'emerge gcc -s' says my version of
|> GCC (2.95.x) is the
|> latest available, even though there are many ebuilds in
|> sys-devel/gcc such as
|> gcc-3.1.ebuild.
|> Why doesn't Portage see them? Is it because GCC>2.95 is not
|> fully tested? How
|> can I override so that I can have both versions on my system?
|>
|> Thank you very much.
|> --
|> icemaze@tiscalinet.it
|> _______________________________________________
|> gentoo-dev mailing list
|> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
|> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
|>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
2002-05-28 11:45 [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1 Matteo Sasso
2002-05-30 0:28 ` Ric Messier
@ 2002-05-30 0:29 ` Christophe Vanfleteren
2002-05-30 0:30 ` Lars Pechan
2002-05-30 9:20 ` Jack Morgan
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Vanfleteren @ 2002-05-30 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 13:45, Matteo Sasso wrote:
> I rsync'd lately but a 'emerge gcc -s' says my version of GCC (2.95.x) is
> the latest available, even though there are many ebuilds in sys-devel/gcc
> such as gcc-3.1.ebuild.
> Why doesn't Portage see them? Is it because GCC>2.95 is not fully tested?
> How can I override so that I can have both versions on my system?
>
> Thank you very much.
Default profile at the moment is still /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0
You have to link /etc/make.profile to the profile you actually want:
rm /etc/make.profile
ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0-gcc3 /etc/make.profile
--
Christophe Vanfleteren
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
2002-05-28 11:45 [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1 Matteo Sasso
2002-05-30 0:28 ` Ric Messier
2002-05-30 0:29 ` Christophe Vanfleteren
@ 2002-05-30 0:30 ` Lars Pechan
2002-05-30 5:22 ` MadCoder
2002-05-30 9:20 ` Jack Morgan
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lars Pechan @ 2002-05-30 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Did you change your profile? I.e. did you:
rm /etc/make.profile
ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0-gcc3 make.profile
In theory a ln -sf should do but that doesn't seem to do it for me.
HTH
/Lasse
PS. If you do a search in the archives or the forums you'll find quite a bit
of info on what needs to be done.
On Tue, 28 May 2002 23:45, Matteo Sasso wrote:
> I rsync'd lately but a 'emerge gcc -s' says my version of GCC (2.95.x) is
> the latest available, even though there are many ebuilds in sys-devel/gcc
> such as gcc-3.1.ebuild.
> Why doesn't Portage see them? Is it because GCC>2.95 is not fully tested?
> How can I override so that I can have both versions on my system?
>
> Thank you very much.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
2002-05-30 0:30 ` Lars Pechan
@ 2002-05-30 5:22 ` MadCoder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: MadCoder @ 2002-05-30 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> In theory a ln -sf should do but that doesn't seem to do it for me.
yes the '-f' option semmes not to work under gentoo.
it's a bit annoying
--
MadCoder (53 53)
"Pour réussir un examen, un étudiant doit lutter contre toutes les forces
centrifuges qui peuvent le distraire de son travail."
- T. de Montbrial
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1
2002-05-28 11:45 [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1 Matteo Sasso
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-05-30 0:30 ` Lars Pechan
@ 2002-05-30 9:20 ` Jack Morgan
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jack Morgan @ 2002-05-30 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:45:05PM +0200, Matteo Sasso wrote:
> Why doesn't Portage see them?
bacause they are masked, meaning they need more testing.
> How can I override so that I can have both versions on my system?
just edit /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask
--
jack_morgan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-30 5:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-28 11:45 [gentoo-dev] How to merge GCC 3.1 Matteo Sasso
2002-05-30 0:28 ` Ric Messier
2002-05-30 0:29 ` Christophe Vanfleteren
2002-05-30 0:30 ` Lars Pechan
2002-05-30 5:22 ` MadCoder
2002-05-30 9:20 ` Jack Morgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox