Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

[Webmaster Refstart.NL]

This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the default 2.11?
I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:

gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n > /v
ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp" failed (B
roken pipe)
sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
stdout: Broken pipe
make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve
rsions] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)

!!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .

How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then install GCC 3.1?

Bye, Niek.


On Wed, 29 May 2002 14:24:18 +0000
Jack Morgan <yojack@jcom.home.ne.jp> wrote:

> I did a fresh install after borking an upgrade atempt. I was able to
> get gcc3.1 to bootstrap. I installed from cdrom, BTW. Here is a short
> summary:
> 
> 1) Bootstrap phase
> Perl wouldn't compile. I had to unmask it, eg comment it out, in
> package.mask. Then it compiled. Version perl5.6.1-r4, I think. 
> My USE variables were set to the default or USE="" and my compiler
> was set to -march=i686 -O6 
> 
> 2) Emerge system
> Everything compiled fine here. Once the system was installed, I added
> many USE variables and changed my compiler to -march=athlon -O6. All
> packages installed after this worked fine using athlon optimization.
> At this point, I wanted to do, emrege -e world but was afraid ;-)
> 
> 3) Xfree-4.2.0-r9
> Wouldn't compile. I unmasked this in package.mask and I'm currently
> compiling xfree-4.2.0-r11. I'll let you know how it goes. 
> 
> Anyway, thanks to all devlopers working on getting gcc-3.1 working.
> 
> -- 
> jack_morgan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

[Lars Pechan]

Sorry for not getting back on this yesterday.

As you may have seen wading through the archives I've been through the same 
problems as you but it only happened when I tried to bootstrap using gcc-3.1. 
I used two different methods to build the gcc to bootstrap with: either 
bootstrapping twice or emerging gcc-3.1 as the very first thing after having 
installed the tarball iff the Gentoo CD.

In both cases I got to the same stage as you, i.e. glibc would not build due 
to the error you've seen.

Spider then reported he'd successfully boostrapped straight from the tarball 
and I and I believe others have done that as well without any problems at all 
(at that stage anyway). Doing it this way means glibc doesn't get built with 
various optimizations but it's probably not a very good idea to do so anyway.

I've built xfree86-4.2.0r9 since without any problems. Maybe different use 
flags is causing this to fail for some and succeed for others?

My use flags are:

USE="alsa directfb dvd 3dnow lm_sensors -gnome spell imap xml doc"

I'm having problems with the nvidia driver but s/w open-gl seems ok. I haven't 
researched this fully but I believe the nvidia issue may well be due to the 
difference in abi between gcc-3.1 compiled system libraries and nvidia's 
binaries (that have been compiled with something else - 2.95 most likely). 
I'm hoping I'm wrong though cause otherwise we have to wait for nvidia to 
release gcc3 compiled drivers. Anyone having had more luck?

kdebase and kdelibs have built fine but I had to do something very ugly to get 
fam-oss to compile (I'm in contact with the maintainer about this one). 
Anyone else having had any problems with this? I can't get as far as kdevelop 
since lynx won't compile but I have a theory that's because of the 
ncurses-issues. 

What else... ah, just tried emerge kde which tries to compile xanim (probably 
due to my use-flags, I think) which fails miserably. Might look into it later 
if I get a chance.

Would be good if other early adopters could post their experiences too.

Finally, I changed my compiler flags to 

C[XX]FLAGS=-march=athlon-xp -O3 -mmmx -m3dnow -pipe

immediately after the bootstrap was done so the emerge system was done with 
them rather than the std -march=i686 -O3 -pipe.

HTH,

/Lasse

On Wed, 29 May 2002 17:43, Webmaster Refstart.NL wrote:
> This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the
> default 2.11? I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils
> 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:
>
> gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n
> > /v ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp"
> failed (B roken pipe)
> sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
> stdout: Broken pipe
> make[1]: ***
> [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve rsions]
> Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5' make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
> !!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
> !!! (no error message)
>
> !!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .
>
> How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then
> install GCC 3.1?
>
> Bye, Niek.
>
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2002 14:24:18 +0000
>
> Jack Morgan <yojack@jcom.home.ne.jp> wrote:
> > I did a fresh install after borking an upgrade atempt. I was able to
> > get gcc3.1 to bootstrap. I installed from cdrom, BTW. Here is a short
> > summary:
> >
> > 1) Bootstrap phase
> > Perl wouldn't compile. I had to unmask it, eg comment it out, in
> > package.mask. Then it compiled. Version perl5.6.1-r4, I think.
> > My USE variables were set to the default or USE="" and my compiler
> > was set to -march=i686 -O6
> >
> > 2) Emerge system
> > Everything compiled fine here. Once the system was installed, I added
> > many USE variables and changed my compiler to -march=athlon -O6. All
> > packages installed after this worked fine using athlon optimization.
> > At this point, I wanted to do, emrege -e world but was afraid ;-)
> >
> > 3) Xfree-4.2.0-r9
> > Wouldn't compile. I unmasked this in package.mask and I'm currently
> > compiling xfree-4.2.0-r11. I'll let you know how it goes.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks to all devlopers working on getting gcc-3.1 working.
> >
> > --
> > jack_morgan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

[Lost Logic]

mkennedy is putting together a website which will have information on 
gcc-3 stuffz on it... I have xfree-4.2.0-r11 merged and am working on 
mozilla-1.0_rc3-r2 plus almost 300 other packages, my own comments will 
also be on mkennedy's site should be up on http://www.gentoo.org/~mkennedy 
sometime tomorrow.  Oh, and my system was bootstrapped with 
binutils-2.12.90.0.7 :)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Previous Message(s)-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:43:47AM +0200, Webmaster Refstart. NL wrote:
> > This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the default 2.11?
> > I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:
> > 
> > gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n > /v
> > ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp" failed (B
> > roken pipe)
> > sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
> > stdout: Broken pipe
> > make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve
> > rsions] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5'
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > 
> > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
> > !!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
> > !!! (no error message)
> > 
> > !!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .
> > 
> > How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then install GCC 3.1?
>  
> I had the exact same error when I tried to upgrade and failed. What I wish I had
> done was:
> 
> *backup any files you want to keep before trying this*
> 
> 1) ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0-gcc3 /etc/make.profile
> 2) emerge -e world  
> 3) Change -march/-mcpu
> 
> If this doesn't work, try reinstalling? 
>  
> -- 
> jack_morgan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

[Webmaster Refstart.NL]

Hi Lars and others,

Thanks a lot for your help, the glibc problem is solved now! :) The problem was that I had emerged GCC 3.1 before I started bootstrapping the system, that's why glibc won't compile. Now I've removed the whole Gentoo partition and started over installing. I've linked /etc/make.profile to /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0-gcc3 and edited the packages file so that binutils 2.12 is choosen instead of 2.11. The bootstrap process is now ready and I have edited the compile flags in /etc/make.conf to match my CPU. I'll try to emerge the system now :)

Thanks again for your help,

Niek.

On Wed, 29 May 2002 18:17:06 +1200
Lars Pechan <lars.pechan@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

> Sorry for not getting back on this yesterday.
> 
> As you may have seen wading through the archives I've been through the same 
> problems as you but it only happened when I tried to bootstrap using gcc-3.1. 
> I used two different methods to build the gcc to bootstrap with: either 
> bootstrapping twice or emerging gcc-3.1 as the very first thing after having 
> installed the tarball iff the Gentoo CD.
> 
> In both cases I got to the same stage as you, i.e. glibc would not build due 
> to the error you've seen.
> 
> Spider then reported he'd successfully boostrapped straight from the tarball 
> and I and I believe others have done that as well without any problems at all 
> (at that stage anyway). Doing it this way means glibc doesn't get built with 
> various optimizations but it's probably not a very good idea to do so anyway.
> 
> I've built xfree86-4.2.0r9 since without any problems. Maybe different use 
> flags is causing this to fail for some and succeed for others?
> 
> My use flags are:
> 
> USE="alsa directfb dvd 3dnow lm_sensors -gnome spell imap xml doc"
> 
> I'm having problems with the nvidia driver but s/w open-gl seems ok. I haven't 
> researched this fully but I believe the nvidia issue may well be due to the 
> difference in abi between gcc-3.1 compiled system libraries and nvidia's 
> binaries (that have been compiled with something else - 2.95 most likely). 
> I'm hoping I'm wrong though cause otherwise we have to wait for nvidia to 
> release gcc3 compiled drivers. Anyone having had more luck?
> 
> kdebase and kdelibs have built fine but I had to do something very ugly to get 
> fam-oss to compile (I'm in contact with the maintainer about this one). 
> Anyone else having had any problems with this? I can't get as far as kdevelop 
> since lynx won't compile but I have a theory that's because of the 
> ncurses-issues. 
> 
> What else... ah, just tried emerge kde which tries to compile xanim (probably 
> due to my use-flags, I think) which fails miserably. Might look into it later 
> if I get a chance.
> 
> Would be good if other early adopters could post their experiences too.
> 
> Finally, I changed my compiler flags to 
> 
> C[XX]FLAGS=-march=athlon-xp -O3 -mmmx -m3dnow -pipe
> 
> immediately after the bootstrap was done so the emerge system was done with 
> them rather than the std -march=i686 -O3 -pipe.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> /Lasse
> 
> On Wed, 29 May 2002 17:43, Webmaster Refstart.NL wrote:
> > This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the
> > default 2.11? I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils
> > 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:
> >
> > gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n
> > > /v ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp"
> > failed (B roken pipe)
> > sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
> > stdout: Broken pipe
> > make[1]: ***
> > [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve rsions]
> > Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5' make: *** [all] Error 2
> >
> > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
> > !!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
> > !!! (no error message)
> >
> > !!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .
> >
> > How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then
> > install GCC 3.1?
> >
> > Bye, Niek.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 29 May 2002 14:24:18 +0000
> >
> > Jack Morgan <yojack@jcom.home.ne.jp> wrote:
> > > I did a fresh install after borking an upgrade atempt. I was able to
> > > get gcc3.1 to bootstrap. I installed from cdrom, BTW. Here is a short
> > > summary:
> > >
> > > 1) Bootstrap phase
> > > Perl wouldn't compile. I had to unmask it, eg comment it out, in
> > > package.mask. Then it compiled. Version perl5.6.1-r4, I think.
> > > My USE variables were set to the default or USE="" and my compiler
> > > was set to -march=i686 -O6
> > >
> > > 2) Emerge system
> > > Everything compiled fine here. Once the system was installed, I added
> > > many USE variables and changed my compiler to -march=athlon -O6. All
> > > packages installed after this worked fine using athlon optimization.
> > > At this point, I wanted to do, emrege -e world but was afraid ;-)
> > >
> > > 3) Xfree-4.2.0-r9
> > > Wouldn't compile. I unmasked this in package.mask and I'm currently
> > > compiling xfree-4.2.0-r11. I'll let you know how it goes.
> > >
> > > Anyway, thanks to all devlopers working on getting gcc-3.1 working.
> > >
> > > --
> > > jack_morgan
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

[gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

[Jack Morgan]

I did a fresh install after borking an upgrade atempt. I was able to
get gcc3.1 to bootstrap. I installed from cdrom, BTW. Here is a short
summary:

1) Bootstrap phase
Perl wouldn't compile. I had to unmask it, eg comment it out, in
package.mask. Then it compiled. Version perl5.6.1-r4, I think. 
My USE variables were set to the default or USE="" and my compiler
was set to -march=i686 -O6 

2) Emerge system
Everything compiled fine here. Once the system was installed, I added
many USE variables and changed my compiler to -march=athlon -O6. All
packages installed after this worked fine using athlon optimization.
At this point, I wanted to do, emrege -e world but was afraid ;-)

3) Xfree-4.2.0-r9
Wouldn't compile. I unmasked this in package.mask and I'm currently
compiling xfree-4.2.0-r11. I'll let you know how it goes. 

Anyway, thanks to all devlopers working on getting gcc-3.1 working.

-- 
jack_morgan

Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success

[Jack Morgan]

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:43:47AM +0200, Webmaster Refstart. NL wrote:
> This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the default 2.11?
> I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:
> 
> gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n > /v
> ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp" failed (B
> roken pipe)
> sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
> stdout: Broken pipe
> make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve
> rsions] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
> !!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
> !!! (no error message)
> 
> !!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .
> 
> How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then install GCC 3.1?
 
I had the exact same error when I tried to upgrade and failed. What I wish I had
done was:

*backup any files you want to keep before trying this*

1) ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0-gcc3 /etc/make.profile
2) emerge -e world  
3) Change -march/-mcpu

If this doesn't work, try reinstalling? 
 
-- 
jack_morgan