From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F081FAC3E7 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:45:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from oregano.parkerpechan.co.nz (203-79-125-118.adsl.paradise.net.nz [203.79.125.118]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98BCD3D90 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 10:45:34 +1200 (NZST) Received: from basil.parkerpechan.co.nz (basil.parkerpechan.co.nz [192.168.0.4]) by oregano.parkerpechan.co.nz (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4RMjYZ08463 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 10:45:34 +1200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Lars Pechan To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.1/binutils 2.12 and glibc compile problems Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:50:09 +1200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <20020527211821.23e87de1.webmaster@refstart.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020527211821.23e87de1.webmaster@refstart.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205280950.09019.lars.pechan@paradise.net.nz> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 03e7543e-8dad-4368-a85d-f28d4d2c4151 X-Archives-Hash: 1cba7ea395a664dad4fe87b46451d5c5 What's your starting point? A raw system straight from a tar-ball off a C= D or=20 have you already bootstrapped once and are trying again to make use of th= e=20 athlon-specific optimization flags? If the answer is 1) then it's odd since it seems quite a few people (incl= uding=20 myself) have been able to bootstrap with gcc-3.1 You may want to review y= our=20 optimization flags, however since the sse-stuff will change the abi and c= ould=20 lead to various problems in the future. If the answer is 2) then that's a known problem: search the list archives= at=20 http://fireserver.ath.cx/gentoo/search/index.html for more info. Oh, and I did bootstrap w. binutils 2.12. /Lasse On Tue, 28 May 2002 07:18, Webmaster Refstart.NL wrote: > Hi all, > > I try to set up a GCC 3.1 based Gentoo system with binutils 2.12. When = I > try to run ./scripts/bootstrap in the directory /usr/portage, I get err= ors > when compiling glibc (sorry, I can't c/p the output). I've the followin= g > compile flags in /etc/make.conf: > > CHOST =3D i686-pc-linux-gnu > CXXFLAGS =3D -march=3Dathlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=3Dsse -mmmx -O3 = -pipe > CFLAGS =3D -march=3Dathlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=3Dsse -mmmx -O3 -p= ipe > > Is this a bug in glibc or should I use binutils 2.11 (without the combr= eloc > tweak)? > > Thanks in advance, > > Niek. > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev