[gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[Bjarke Sørensen]

Uhm, shouldn't metacity be masked for now?

Is has some dependancies that are masked.


-- 
| Bjarke Sørensen  /  9000.WASD 
|
|  There are 10 types of people in this world:
|  Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Re: [gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 616 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Fri, 24 May 2002 07:06:35 +0200
Bjarke Sørensen <bs@wasd.dk> wrote:

> Uhm, shouldn't metacity be masked for now?
> 
> Is has some dependancies that are masked.

Well, people who -want- metacity ( you know, you can install it without
Gnome2 ) should know what they are after, and to have it masked then
would be "not fun", besides, the only reason gtk+ 2 is masked is all the
packages in portage that depend on the wrong versions of gtk+ ..


//Spider



--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[JR Boyens]

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:57:03PM +0200 or thereabouts, Spider wrote:
> begin  quote
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 07:06:35 +0200
> Bjarke S?rensen <bs@wasd.dk> wrote:
> 
> > Uhm, shouldn't metacity be masked for now?
> > 
> > Is has some dependancies that are masked.
> 
> Well, people who -want- metacity ( you know, you can install it without
> Gnome2 ) should know what they are after, and to have it masked then
> would be "not fun", besides, the only reason gtk+ 2 is masked is all the
> packages in portage that depend on the wrong versions of gtk+ ..

I think that a list of these packages would be very nice so that those
of us who have nothing better to do could start fixing these ebuild to
depend on the right versions. Also a "Orphaned Ebuilds" list would be
nice as well. :)

__
JR Boyens
jboyens@fooninja.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 635 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:11:20 -0500
JR Boyens <jboyens@fooninja.org> wrote:

> I think that a list of these packages would be very nice so that those
> of us who have nothing better to do could start fixing these ebuild to
> depend on the right versions. Also a "Orphaned Ebuilds" list would be
> nice as well. :)
> 

Orphaned I dont know about, but the gtk+ ones...
grep -r ">=x11-libs/gtk+"  /usr/portage/
grep -r " x11-libs/gtk+ " /usr/portage/


there you go :)

//Spider


--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[JR Boyens]

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 06:32:29PM +0200 or thereabouts, Spider wrote:
> begin  quote
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:11:20 -0500
> JR Boyens <jboyens@fooninja.org> wrote:
> 
> > I think that a list of these packages would be very nice so that those
> > of us who have nothing better to do could start fixing these ebuild to
> > depend on the right versions. Also a "Orphaned Ebuilds" list would be
> > nice as well. :)
> > 
> 
> Orphaned I dont know about, but the gtk+ ones...
> grep -r ">=x11-libs/gtk+"  /usr/portage/
> grep -r " x11-libs/gtk+ " /usr/portage/


So which one is correct? Should it depend on "=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2"?


> 
> 
> there you go :)
> 
> //Spider
> 
> 
> --
> begin  .signature
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
> end

Re: [gentoo-dev] mask metacity

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 336 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Fri, 24 May 2002 14:55:55 -0500
JR Boyens <jboyens@fooninja.org> wrote:

> So which one is correct? Should it depend on "=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2"?
=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*  
 
//Spider
--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] emerge search

[Sean P. Kane]

emerge search seems to only search the name of the ebuild. Is there
currently any way to also search the description? And if not is there
any reason not to implement this? Doing something like 'emerge search
irc' does not return BitchX as an example. And something like icc
'Intel's cc compiler' might be hard to search for since you may 
not know the Gentoo agreed upon name of icc and simply search for intel.


Thanks,
Sean 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean P. Kane                                       
spkane@genomatica.com
Lead Infrastructure Architect                       Genomatica, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   "When we destroy something man has created we call it vandalism......
    When we destroy something that Gaia has created we call it
progress."

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge search

[david mattatall]

On May 24, 2002 02:34 pm, Sean P. Kane wrote:
> emerge search seems to only search the name of the ebuild. Is there
> currently any way to also search the description? And if not is there
> any reason not to implement this? Doing something like 'emerge search
> irc' does not return BitchX as an example. And something like icc
> 'Intel's cc compiler' might be hard to search for since you may
> not know the Gentoo agreed upon name of icc and simply search for intel.

hrmm, don't take any offence to this but bitchx is in /usr/portage/net-irc. 
and what if some one does a description search for "a"?

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge search

[Paul de Vrieze]

On Saturday 25 May 2002 16:34, david mattatall wrote:
> On May 24, 2002 02:34 pm, Sean P. Kane wrote:
> > emerge search seems to only search the name of the ebuild. Is there
> > currently any way to also search the description? And if not is there
> > any reason not to implement this? Doing something like 'emerge search
> > irc' does not return BitchX as an example. And something like icc
> > 'Intel's cc compiler' might be hard to search for since you may
> > not know the Gentoo agreed upon name of icc and simply search for intel.
>
> hrmm, don't take any offence to this but bitchx is in /usr/portage/net-irc.
> and what if some one does a description search for "a"?

grep doesn't disallow you to do a:
grep -r "a" /*

does it?

If people want to be stupid, let them. I think an added option of this nature 
can be useful. I do think though a separate search command is more 
appropriate though.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

RE: [gentoo-dev] emerge search

[Sean P. Kane]

Then they deserve what they get. 

It would still be nice to search descriptions. And if bitchx is in
net-irc then a search for irc should still find it and it doesn't. I'm
more then capable of looking in /usr/portage, but that really isn't the
point. For search to be truly usefull it should search more then the
name field.

Sean


-----Original Message-----
From: david mattatall [mailto:davidsmind@linuxbasics.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 07:35
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge search


On May 24, 2002 02:34 pm, Sean P. Kane wrote:
> emerge search seems to only search the name of the ebuild. Is there 
> currently any way to also search the description? And if not is there 
> any reason not to implement this? Doing something like 'emerge search 
> irc' does not return BitchX as an example. And something like icc 
> 'Intel's cc compiler' might be hard to search for since you may not 
> know the Gentoo agreed upon name of icc and simply search for intel.

hrmm, don't take any offence to this but bitchx is in
/usr/portage/net-irc. 
and what if some one does a description search for "a"?
_______________________________________________
gentoo-dev mailing list
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev