* [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.1-r1
@ 2002-05-22 15:10 Alex Walker
2002-05-22 16:54 ` Spider
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alex Walker @ 2002-05-22 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Dev
'ello Gentoo
OK, I have pretty much rebuilt my system with 3.1 now, but for a few
issues which seem to have been mentioned before. However, I have not
seen any reference to the following problem:
I have no makeinfo or install-info commands. From other people using
qpkg, I found out that these should both belong to gcc. So I figured a
remerge of gcc might help... nope, still don't have the commands.
I have unmerged both 3.1 and 2.95, keeping only 3.1-r1.
Any help appreciated.
Alex.
(Praying the power doesn't cut before I can recompile util-linux so I
can use login without it segfaulting)
--
----------( My computer can beat up your computer. )----------
ALEX -----( - Karl Lehenbauer )----- X3JA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.1-r1
2002-05-22 15:10 [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.1-r1 Alex Walker
@ 2002-05-22 16:54 ` Spider
2002-05-22 17:08 ` Alex Walker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Spider @ 2002-05-22 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1345 bytes --]
makeinfo and install-info are both in texinfo, version 4.2 is in portage
but I had it masked since it depends on new automake and autoconf.
//Spider
begin quote
On Wed, 22 May 2002 16:10:44 +0100
Alex Walker <alex@x3ja.co.uk> wrote:
> 'ello Gentoo
>
> OK, I have pretty much rebuilt my system with 3.1 now, but for a few
> issues which seem to have been mentioned before. However, I have not
> seen any reference to the following problem:
>
> I have no makeinfo or install-info commands. From other people using
> qpkg, I found out that these should both belong to gcc. So I figured
> a remerge of gcc might help... nope, still don't have the commands.
>
> I have unmerged both 3.1 and 2.95, keeping only 3.1-r1.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> Alex.
> (Praying the power doesn't cut before I can recompile util-linux so I
> can use login without it segfaulting)
>
> --
> ----------( My computer can beat up your computer.
> )---------- ALEX -----( - Karl Lehenbauer
> )----- X3JA
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.1-r1
2002-05-22 16:54 ` Spider
@ 2002-05-22 17:08 ` Alex Walker
2002-05-22 17:13 ` MadCoder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alex Walker @ 2002-05-22 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:54:25PM +0200, Spider wrote:
> makeinfo and install-info are both in texinfo, version 4.2 is in
> portage but I had it masked since it depends on new automake and
> autoconf.
Is there a new m4 on the way so that autoconf and automake will build?
When I try and build them it gives an error on "Requires m4 version 1.4"
and m4 --version gives 1.4ppre2. or is this masked somewhere too?
Alex.
--
Find out what I've been up to -( Every man is as God made him, ay, and )-
recently - look at: -( often worse. )-
http://www.x3ja.co.uk -( -- Miguel de Cervantes )-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.1-r1
2002-05-22 17:08 ` Alex Walker
@ 2002-05-22 17:13 ` MadCoder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: MadCoder @ 2002-05-22 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> Is there a new m4 on the way so that autoconf and automake will build?
> When I try and build them it gives an error on "Requires m4 version 1.4"
> and m4 --version gives 1.4ppre2. or is this masked somewhere too?
I got the sames errors.
autoconf/automake is the only thing that not compiles in emerge systme except
the last perl, but previous did.
When will xfree compile with gcc3 ? a few days, a week , ... ?
--
Linux, c'est comme la France, ce serait le + beau pays du monde s'il
n'était pas peuplé par des arrogants, suffisants pensants détenir
tout le savoir du monde...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-22 17:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-22 15:10 [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.1-r1 Alex Walker
2002-05-22 16:54 ` Spider
2002-05-22 17:08 ` Alex Walker
2002-05-22 17:13 ` MadCoder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox