From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_QUAR,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from tharkserver.tharknet.lotr (pD9E12FAF.dip.t-dialin.net [217.225.47.175]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2475AAC3BD for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 14:03:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from tharkun.tharknet.lotr (tharkun.tharknet.lotr [192.168.168.200]) by tharkserver.tharknet.lotr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479E31EC60E for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 21:03:30 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Alexander Gretencord To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reiserfs Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:03:29 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <23DFAA462CC6A64487613B0E242D9FF706EC65@mercury.phoenix-interactive.com> <200205142017.20194.arutha@gmx.de> <20020514133210.P5849@firinn.org> In-Reply-To: <20020514133210.P5849@firinn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205142103.29925.arutha@gmx.de> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 7899cab4-c01a-47d1-ba16-0d392e6f9004 X-Archives-Hash: e7256118259a1e9e4ba40179c66c415d On Tuesday 14 May 2002 20:32, Mark Bainter wrote: > Except that it still only reflects a few people's opinion. Unless you = have > the overwhelming support of the community that a particular filesystem = is > bad news Yeah right. There obviously are people that have problems with xfs (and a= s you=20 can see JMS said there was JFS that you could use, I gave an example abou= t it=20 not being stable and some others joined in though _he_ would recommend it= =2E..=20 You're probably right to leave the fs part out completely. > The reason is that then you have to track that. You have to watch its > development and remember to go back and change it all in the documentat= ion > later when it gets fixed up...or disappears from active development. Yeah thats too true. Alex --=20 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary saf= ety=20 deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin