public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Bainter <mark-gt@cymry.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reiserfs
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:52:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020514105242.N5849@firinn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205141039.19317.jsmith@kcco.com>; from jsmith@kcco.com on Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:39:19AM -0500

Jean-Michel Smith [jsmith@kcco.com] wrote:
> recover from backup tapes.  Nevertheless it resulted in an allnighter getting 
> the system back up, on a more reliable ext2 filesystem, followed by several 
> days work as he moved other installations off of reiser and onto ext2 (his 

And I've spent all-nighters restoring from ext2 filesystems, simply because 
the system wasn't shut down properly.  

> I have personally witnessed data loss using reiser on numerous occasions ... 
> symptoms ranged from strange "undeletable" files that were corrupt, to entire 
> directory trees vanishing for no apparent reason (but the disk usage 
> remaining unchanged).  No recovery was possible in either case (short of 
> reconstructing a new filesystem from scratch and restoring from backups).

I just had strange undeletable files on my ext2 filesystem less than a 
week ago.  In fact, once I finally got it fixed, it happened two more times
that same night.  

You also suggested ext3.  Ext3 has been a disaster for me thus far.  It's
been the only filesystem I've had trouble with (outside of the typical
issues we're all used to with ext2).  However, I wouldn't go so far as to
say nobody should use it just because I and a few people I know have had
bad experiences with it.  I know there are people out there running it 
successfully but I wouldn't even trust it to hold my /tmp filesystem.

> In all these cases all of us had all been using reiserfs "for months with no 
> problems" ... and we still suffered severe data loss.
> 
> Reiserfs is NOT ready for production use, and the gentoo FAQ is both wise and 
> friendly for pointing that out and guiding people away from that particular 
> folly.

I just can't agree.  What exactly is your required time frame for running 
reiserfs with no problems before you think it's stable?  I personally have
been running reiserfs on my systems since before it was even merged into the
mainline kernel.  I work the hell out of my systems and I've never had a
problem.  

I've had it in production systems as well, for almost as long.  In systems
ranging from large, high load email servers, to web servers handling approx
1.5 million page views a month.  I've never had a problem with it.

I'm not trying to be insulting, but lets not forget the human factor in this
equation.  I don't really know you, or the people you cite, so please don't
take this as a slam on your skills, I'm just noting there's more to factor
in here than just the filesystem.  If you don't know reiserfs that well, and
just know ext2, or ext3 maybe you have less problems because of that, rather
than because of the relative quality of the two filesystems.



  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-14 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-14 14:56 [gentoo-dev] reiserfs Sean Mitchell
2002-05-14 15:07 ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-05-14 15:39   ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-05-14 15:52     ` Mark Bainter [this message]
2002-05-14 16:21       ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-05-14 16:30         ` Ben Lutgens
2002-05-14 17:07     ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-05-14 17:22       ` Per Wigren
2002-05-14 18:50         ` Matthew Kennedy
2002-05-14 19:09           ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-05-14 17:49       ` Mark Bainter
2002-05-14 18:17         ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-05-14 18:32           ` Mark Bainter
2002-05-14 19:03             ` Alexander Gretencord
2002-05-14 20:39         ` Mikko Moilanen
2002-05-14 22:44         ` Bill Kenworthy
2002-05-15  0:10           ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-05-15  0:39             ` Spider
2002-05-15  0:57               ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-05-14 21:29       ` Spider
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-14 15:39 Sean Mitchell
2002-05-14 14:44 Brady Wied
2002-05-14 21:17 ` Spider
2002-05-15  8:20   ` Alexander Gretencord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020514105242.N5849@firinn.org \
    --to=mark-gt@cymry.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox