[gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Arcady Genkin]

Mozilla 1.0rc2 has been out for a little while, and, since it contains
security-related fixes, I think that we should feature it in our
portage collection.

Anyhow, I've committed the ebuild for it (the legwork done by David
Wirch <kuma@linuxboxen.org>).  It is masked for now.  Could y'all try
it out, and if it works for everybody, we should unmask it and remove
the ebuilds for the previous versions (because of the security
vulnerability in them).

HAND,
-- 
Arcady Genkin
Thanks God I'm still an atheist! -- Luis Bunuel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[William McArthur]

Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Could y'all try it out.

I was about to send a success email because it worked fine on the web 
pages I tried but then when I clicked send in the mail compose window 
nothing happened.

That is a problem worthy of keeping it masked IMO.

Sandy McArthur

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Ben Lutgens]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 824 bytes --]

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:41:35PM -0400, William McArthur wrote:
>I was about to send a success email because it worked fine on the web 
>pages I tried but then when I clicked send in the mail compose window 
>nothing happened.
>
>That is a problem worthy of keeping it masked IMO.

I tend to disagree as alot of people do not require mail support in mozilla.

Couldn't it just be made to die if the use for mozilla mail support was
enabled with the message that says "Mozilla mail support is broken in this
rev. If you require mozilla mail support use $NON_BUSTED_VERSION"

-- 
Ben Lutgens				 | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/	
System Administrator	 | http://www.sistina.com/
Sistina Software Inc. | 

"I got a wife and kids too but you don't see me out here stealing Imperial
Droids now do ya?"

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Ryan Phillips]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 911 bytes --]

On Mon, 13 May 2002 18:44:51 -0500
"Ben Lutgens" <blutgens@sistina.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:41:35PM -0400, William McArthur wrote:
> >I was about to send a success email because it worked fine on the web 
> >pages I tried but then when I clicked send in the mail compose window 
> >nothing happened.
> >
> >That is a problem worthy of keeping it masked IMO.
> 
> I tend to disagree as alot of people do not require mail support in mozilla.
> 
> Couldn't it just be made to die if the use for mozilla mail support was
> enabled with the message that says "Mozilla mail support is broken in this
> rev. If you require mozilla mail support use $NON_BUSTED_VERSION"
> 

I believe it is a bad idea to start including 'broken' ebuilds in portage.
I don't believe it is professional.  If something doesn't work, then it should
be use-at-your-own-risk, which is why we have the masking feature.

~ryan~

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Thilo Bangert]

> I believe it is a bad idea to start including 'broken' ebuilds in
> portage. I don't believe it is professional.  If something doesn't
> work, then it should be use-at-your-own-risk, which is why we have
> the masking feature.
>

this is true - however, mozilla_rc1 contains a security bug which needs 
to be fixed too!

> ~ryan~

-- 
regards                             |  Please file bugreports here:
Thilo                               |  http://bugs.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Ben Lutgens]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:34:29PM -0700, Ryan Phillips wrote:
>
>I believe it is a bad idea to start including 'broken' ebuilds in portage.
>I don't believe it is professional.  If something doesn't work, then it should
>be use-at-your-own-risk, which is why we have the masking feature.

But if you don't allow it to build the broken piece you still have a stable
piece of software. I fail to see how having the ebuild fail if the user
requests a broken part of it is "unprofessional". 

Also, I'm of the opinion that anything security related should be elevated
on the priority list a wee bit.

-- 
Ben Lutgens				 | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/	
System Administrator	 | http://www.sistina.com/
Sistina Software Inc. | 

"I got a wife and kids too but you don't see me out here stealing Imperial
Droids now do ya?"

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Ian Smith]

Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Mozilla 1.0rc2 has been out for a little while, and, since it contains
> security-related fixes, I think that we should feature it in our
> portage collection.
> 
> Anyhow, I've committed the ebuild for it (the legwork done by David
> Wirch <kuma@linuxboxen.org>).  It is masked for now.  Could y'all try
> it out, and if it works for everybody, we should unmask it and remove
> the ebuilds for the previous versions (because of the security
> vulnerability in them).
> 
> HAND,

Using it to write this reply - nice one Arcady!

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Smith
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[William McArthur]

William McArthur wrote:
> I was about to send a success email because it worked fine on the web 
> pages I tried but then when I clicked send in the mail compose window 
> nothing happened.

I tracked the problem down to the Enigmail add on package. So change my 
vote to unmask it.

Sandy McArthur

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild for Mozilla 1.0rc2

[Arcady Genkin]

William McArthur <sandymac@gentoo.org> writes:

> William McArthur wrote:
>> I was about to send a success email because it worked fine on the
>> web pages I tried but then when I clicked send in the mail compose
>> window nothing happened.
>
> I tracked the problem down to the Enigmail add on package. So change
> my vote to unmask it.

Okay then.  Here it goes. ;^)  Thanks to all of you for testing!
-- 
Arcady Genkin
Thanks God I'm still an atheist! -- Luis Bunuel