From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp-1.attica.net.nz (pop3-1.tranzpeer.net [202.180.66.199]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A67E0ABDA4 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:44:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 12743 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2002 09:44:37 -0000 Received: from 202-180-68-100.nas1.wlg.attica.net.nz (HELO BMF) (202.180.68.100) by pop3-1.tranzpeer.net with SMTP; 27 Apr 2002 09:44:37 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:47:49 +1200 From: Milos Negovanovic To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ALSA 0.9.0rc1 packages committed Message-Id: <20020427214749.419f2558.milosn@slingshot.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <200204271134.39060.awaschb@gwdg.de> References: <87znzpczuy.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> <200204271134.39060.awaschb@gwdg.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 1974deb5-da70-4865-ac6f-84480c3be248 X-Archives-Hash: c30370d20a4f91e732b77e4b52470b38 Hello, have u unmerged previous driver before emerging new one? I did and basicaly new modules are not installed during emerge of RC1, and no error comes up. My guess is that if u havent unmerged previos driver, old modules are still there and thats why u get that error while everything seems to be OK. Milos On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:34:28 +0200 Andreas Waschbuesch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > electrogramma illius Arcady Genkin profluit verbis: > > I just updated alsa-drivers, alsa-lib, alsa-utils, alsa-oss, and > > alsa-tools packages to the latest version (0.9.0rc1). Could you > > people please test them, and we should unmask the 0.9 version of > > alsa, since, according to alsa's web site[1]: > > > > The 0.5.x series is considered deprecated and is no longer > > supported by ALSA developers. > > > > One gotcha when upgrading to the new version is that portage thinks > > that 0.9.0.1_beta10 is newer than 0.9.0_rc1. Note that the 0.9.0.1 > > version was a hack to work around portage's deficiency with handling > > alphabetic parts in versions (it should have been 0.9.0a_beta10, but > > that doesn't work with portage). Now that hack has backfired on us, > > and anyone who wants to upgrade would have to specify the new > > version for alsa-lib and alsa-utils. :-( > > > > Footnotes: > > [1] http://www.alsa-project.org/ > > alsa-lib AND -utils complain about wrong or missing alsa-driver during > emerge, though everything is in place :-( > > Greets - Andrew > > - -- > Andreas Waschbuesch, GAUniversity KG MA FNZ FK01 > eMail: awaschb@gwdg.de > > Populus vult decipi. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE8ynCu2s5UCjOaQbYRAqs7AKC+4ra+Lzv1ltlGmPecENodoJyo+QCgroEt > kGr4VCi0etsyFFYyXRyO340= > =5ei3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >