From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de (mailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.26]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4495ABDA4 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:35:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pd958fb95.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.88.251.149] helo=kusanagi.ghost.org) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #11) id 171Obz-0006tu-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:35:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Andreas Waschbuesch Organization: GAUniversity Goettingen To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ALSA 0.9.0rc1 packages committed Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:34:28 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <87znzpczuy.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> In-Reply-To: <87znzpczuy.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200204271134.39060.awaschb@gwdg.de> X-RBL-Warning: (rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org) Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 9fcd2b19-29dc-46af-90f0-9513d8b033cb X-Archives-Hash: c381311676b3dbe1842552781f1b1144 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 electrogramma illius Arcady Genkin profluit verbis: > I just updated alsa-drivers, alsa-lib, alsa-utils, alsa-oss, and > alsa-tools packages to the latest version (0.9.0rc1). Could you > people please test them, and we should unmask the 0.9 version of alsa, > since, according to alsa's web site[1]: > > The 0.5.x series is considered deprecated and is no longer > supported by ALSA developers. > > One gotcha when upgrading to the new version is that portage thinks > that 0.9.0.1_beta10 is newer than 0.9.0_rc1. Note that the 0.9.0.1 > version was a hack to work around portage's deficiency with handling > alphabetic parts in versions (it should have been 0.9.0a_beta10, but > that doesn't work with portage). Now that hack has backfired on us, > and anyone who wants to upgrade would have to specify the new version > for alsa-lib and alsa-utils. :-( > > Footnotes: > [1] http://www.alsa-project.org/ alsa-lib AND -utils complain about wrong or missing alsa-driver during em= erge,=20 though everything is in place :-( Greets - Andrew - --=20 Andreas Waschbuesch, GAUniversity KG MA FNZ FK01 eMail: awaschb@gwdg.de Populus vult decipi. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8ynCu2s5UCjOaQbYRAqs7AKC+4ra+Lzv1ltlGmPecENodoJyo+QCgroEt kGr4VCi0etsyFFYyXRyO340=3D =3D5ei3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----