From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <paul@devrieze.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,
	DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from mailnews.kub.nl (mailnews.kub.nl [137.56.0.220])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8030A20AADCC
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:02:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from pavlvs1.local.devrieze.net (gt0416.kub.nl [137.56.97.162])
	by mailnews.kub.nl (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3BJ2GfK002906
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:02:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul de Vrieze <paul@devrieze.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Made sparc32 port of gentoo
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:02:16 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111711160.17596-100000@murphy.localnet>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111711160.17596-100000@murphy.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200204112102.16127.paul@devrieze.net>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: bd653bcf-48e0-4031-aa9e-4126d8daadde
X-Archives-Hash: c6fee862bd4103ad5f1122911cae1cdb

On Thursday 11 April 2002 17:15, maarten@murphy.belgonet.be wrote:
> Jared,
>
> Another one with old Sparc hardware :). I'll be sure to lower the
> stage1 CPU requirements to hopefully include support for sun4c and
> better though I might not be able to test it on anything less than
> sun4m. I use sun4u for building.
>
> cheers,
> maarten
>

I have a sparc-classic, that I could use for testing. It would be fun,=20
the only problem is its limited harddisk (nfs??? I don't know yet)
Paul

--=20
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net