From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from asprexch.aspre.com (unknown [12.41.3.2]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FADA2019FB4 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from archangel.aspre.net (192.168.2.16 [192.168.2.16]) by asprexch.aspre.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2655.55) id 2VW7NLPD; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:09:19 -0400 Received: from archangel.aspre.net (archangel.aspre.net [127.0.0.1]) by archangel.aspre.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D35C8AFE for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:09:16 -0400 From: Marc Soda To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Made sparc32 port of gentoo Message-Id: <20020411150916.5360b404.marc@aspre.net> In-Reply-To: <200204112102.16127.paul@devrieze.net> References: <200204112102.16127.paul@devrieze.net> Organization: ASPRE, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-PGP-Fingerprint: 47DA 9F9A 11A0 252D 8A4D B3F9 F3FA 063C 218C 4848 X-PGP-ID: 218C4848 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: b734f2e2-dab4-43d5-ab47-5cca327a4682 X-Archives-Hash: 78789329fe138336bb65900a876c17a5 I have a Netra to test on. On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:02:16 +0200 Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Thursday 11 April 2002 17:15, maarten@murphy.belgonet.be wrote: > > Jared, > > > > Another one with old Sparc hardware :). I'll be sure to lower the > > stage1 CPU requirements to hopefully include support for sun4c and > > better though I might not be able to test it on anything less than > > sun4m. I use sun4u for building. > > > > cheers, > > maarten > > > > I have a sparc-classic, that I could use for testing. It would be fun, > the only problem is its limited harddisk (nfs??? I don't know yet) > Paul > > -- > Paul de Vrieze > Junior Researcher > Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl > Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev > -- Marc Soda ASPRE, Inc. marc@aspre.net http://www.aspre.net/