From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_QUAR,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from yatze.fizzelpark.com (yatze.fizzelpark.com [195.94.81.200]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 64E9A20AADCC for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:17:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 13183 invoked by uid 507); 8 Apr 2002 17:15:26 -0000 Received: from thilo.bangert@gmx.net by yatze by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.10 (sophie: 2.7/3.52. . Clear:0. Processed in 0.934145 secs); 08 Apr 2002 17:15:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO there) (212.88.65.221) by mail.fizzelpark.com (195.94.81.201) with SMTP; 08 Apr 2002 17:15:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Thilo Bangert To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:46:02 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20020408044612.4489e915.spider@gentoo.org> <200204081154.02951.verwilst@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200204081154.02951.verwilst@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020408171720.64E9A20AADCC@chiba.3jane.net> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 2dd6d393-f9df-4895-be53-4de1dbbc046c X-Archives-Hash: 1b6cecc2e52ef5b593dcab8c26c08980 On Monday, 8. April 2002 11:54, you wrote: > Hi > > Euhm... > These benchmarks of spider were compile times? :o) > Damn.. I still don't know wether i will have a faster system with gcc > 3.x than i had with gcc 2.95.x... please tell me: > Is gcc 3.x faster than 2.95 during RUNTIME and execution of the > program? the german magazin ix ( http://www.heise.de/ix/ ) did some benchmarks (spec) on gcc 3.0 and gcc 2.95.3 which showed that gcc3.0 was faster - but not by much in some cases (bzip) it was slower! but then, i don't remember if they bootstrapped the compiler.... > > Thanks! :o) -- regards Thilo