From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <verwilst@gentoo.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from tartarus.telenet-ops.be (tartarus.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.34])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373C02019F47
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 04:54:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id AFD5E217339
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 11:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Gentoo (D5E008AB.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.8.171])
	by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D8F21719B
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 11:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Bart Verwilst <verwilst@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 11:54:02 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
References: <F125KsD4cKbJWYumCRM0000ad86@hotmail.com> <20020408044612.4489e915.spider@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020408044612.4489e915.spider@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200204081154.02951.verwilst@gentoo.org>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Reply-To: verwilst@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: c99f1f03-77d1-41a1-9182-02b8a2f9ee47
X-Archives-Hash: 0b0d71a9bbffa92fff0d098b0629a27f

Hi

Euhm...
These benchmarks of spider were compile times? :o)
Damn.. I still don't know wether i will have a faster system with gcc 3.x
than i had with gcc 2.95.x... please tell me:
Is gcc 3.x faster than 2.95 during RUNTIME and execution of the program?

Thanks! :o)

--=20
Bart Verwilst
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Gent, Belgium