From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@mat-153.math.helsinki.fi>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DMARC_QUAR,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from no-spam.it.helsinki.fi (NO-SPAM.it.helsinki.fi [128.214.205.34])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C132019F47
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 04:58:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mat-153.math.helsinki.fi (mat-153.math.helsinki.fi [128.214.72.113])
	by no-spam.it.helsinki.fi (8.11.4/8.11.4-SPAMmers-sod-off) with ESMTP id g389vqW26809
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:58:15 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from e by mat-153.math.helsinki.fi with local (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 16uVu1-0004dJ-00
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 12:57:33 +0300
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:57:33 +0300
From: Einar Karttunen <ekarttun@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff
Message-ID: <20020408095733.GA23869@shellak.helsinki.fi>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
References: <F125KsD4cKbJWYumCRM0000ad86@hotmail.com> <20020408044612.4489e915.spider@gentoo.org> <200204081154.02951.verwilst@gentoo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200204081154.02951.verwilst@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 3e316a91-9987-4c4b-920a-82fbbab0c4fd
X-Archives-Hash: 560f66a2cea5abed4b1e4be9266ac7cf

On 08.04 11:54, Bart Verwilst wrote:
> These benchmarks of spider were compile times? :o)
> Damn.. I still don't know wether i will have a faster system with gcc 3.x
> than i had with gcc 2.95.x... please tell me:
> Is gcc 3.x faster than 2.95 during RUNTIME and execution of the program?
> 

it depends on the program :-)

In most cases the code generated by gcc 3.x is faster than that 
generated by 2.95.x. 

- Einar Karttunen