From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail4.intermedia.net (mail4.intermedia.net [206.40.48.154]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6487A2000156 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:31:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from Darkmere.psychozone (unverified [194.18.231.27]) by mail4.intermedia.net (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:31:12 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 01:25:00 +0200 From: Spider To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc 2.95.3 / 3.0.4 speed comparsion Message-Id: <20020408012500.39eeb26f.spider@deathangel.net> In-Reply-To: <20020408005446.73cc3c69.spider@gentoo.org> References: <20020408005446.73cc3c69.spider@gentoo.org> Organization: Deathangel.NET X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Message: Why does this appear like this? X-Apparently-From: Jupiter X-A_Mail_Client_Is_Not_A_Web_Browser:

12:00

X-Complaints-To: /dev/null Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=./rGMk9wOUCC1U0" Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 9ca4ef48-2533-4782-943e-21efa5e8bd70 X-Archives-Hash: 39475365f70c70d6e8fe16cc71304ef3 --=./rGMk9wOUCC1U0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit And some more numbers: gcc 3.0.4 - gabber real 14m51.179s user 12m3.010s sys 0m34.320s gcc 2.95.3 - gabber real 7m53.177s user 6m57.450s sys 0m29.940s begin quote On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 00:54:46 +0200 Spider wrote: > Hello, I've just upgraded my -rc6 to -1.0-gcc3 and decided to make an > (unofficial) benchmark. > > I went for galeon, I had originally intended to use mozilla, but the > time-results borked so I go for galeon instead.. smaller codebase, so > its not as great difference, but it does have both c and c++ code, so > it might be a decent choice. > > > gcc 2.95.3 : > real 3m38.592s > user 2m46.810s > sys 0m28.100s > CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe" > CXXFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe" > > > gcc 3.0.4 : > real 5m6.465s > user 3m27.440s > sys 0m30.140s > CFLAGS="-march=athlon -O3 -pipe" > CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon -O3 -pipe" > > > > > if you only compare the "user" time it should be enough... as the > "sys" show, there's a few percentages difference between them, so this > is not scientific or anything. > > Would be interesting to compare the results as well, since those are > quite likely rather different with the new levels of optimization... > > > //Spider > > > -- > begin happy99.exe > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end > -- begin happy99.exe This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=./rGMk9wOUCC1U0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8sNVNXNNftdcUD70RAjNsAJ9t9L6ZkwD7LCT8RJqeM3LPRA7+cgCdFLEM 0rQR0T6v/EFzz+r9VGBCDMQ= =V7Ec -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=./rGMk9wOUCC1U0--