And some more numbers:

gcc 3.0.4 - gabber
real    14m51.179s
user    12m3.010s
sys     0m34.320s

gcc 2.95.3 - gabber
real    7m53.177s
user    6m57.450s
sys     0m29.940s



begin  quote
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 00:54:46 +0200
Spider <spider@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Hello, I've just upgraded my -rc6 to -1.0-gcc3 and decided to make an
> (unofficial) benchmark.
> 
> I went for galeon, I had originally intended to use mozilla, but the
> time-results borked so I go for galeon instead.. smaller codebase, so
> its not as great difference, but it does have both c and c++ code, so
> it might be a decent choice.
> 
> 
> gcc 2.95.3 :
> real    3m38.592s
> user    2m46.810s
> sys     0m28.100s
> CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe"
> CXXFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe"
> 
> 
> gcc 3.0.4 :
> real    5m6.465s
> user    3m27.440s
> sys     0m30.140s
> CFLAGS="-march=athlon -O3 -pipe"
> CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon -O3 -pipe"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> if you only compare the "user" time it should be enough... as the
> "sys" show, there's a few percentages difference between them, so this
> is not scientific or anything.
> 
> Would be interesting to compare the results as well, since those are
> quite likely rather different with the new levels of optimization...
> 
> 
> //Spider
> 
> 
> --
> begin  happy99.exe
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
> end
> 


--
begin  happy99.exe
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end