From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from eos.telenet-ops.be (eos.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.40]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C982019D77 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 05:01:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 07CFA20145 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 12:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Gentoo (D5E008AB.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.8.171]) by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E9B20143 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 12:01:48 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Bart Verwilst To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 3.0.4 installed system Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 12:02:01 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <1018094468.8723.23.camel@oak.uwyn.office> <1018150166.1076.7.camel@haven> In-Reply-To: <1018150166.1076.7.camel@haven> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200204071202.01692.verwilst@gentoo.org> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Reply-To: verwilst@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 12f0491f-179f-4196-9e25-30be2c0c9394 X-Archives-Hash: 94e010f28598276ed9ef467c3d4e8d85 Howdy Yeah, i think a gentoo-1.0-gcc3.x-ix86.iso would be great! Ofcourse i'm not the person to make this, not quite my area :o) And my question still remains, is gcc 3.x slower than gcc 2.95.x? :o) See ya! On Sunday 07 April 2002 05:29, Preston A. Elder wrote: || Personally, I'd be very interested to know how you did this 'from || scratch'. || || I myself have done this from the post-bootstrap (but pre emerge system= ) || stage on, but I cant bootstrap with 3.0.x, why? || || Well, the image the ISO installs has many applications on it, not link= ed || statically (eg. tar, etc) -- compiling gcc3.0.4 works fine, but as soo= n || as it then compiles glibc 2.2.5 and installs it, nothing else works. || || The utilities on the install image look for glibc 2.2.5 compiled with || gcc 2.95.x. So until there is an install image that has statically || linked binaries on it, I dont see how a bootstrap can be achieved usin= g || 3.0.x compilers. || || I too, however, have installed a 3.0.x based system. I did the || bootstrap on 2.95.3, then first thing after bootstrap, I merged gcc || 3.0.4, and then did my emerge system. As Geert said, a few problems || along the way, but not many. I too made patches for all the problems = I || found, I submitted them to Geert. The patches I made are ALL backward || compatable to 2.95.3 (I believe, I've not tested this). But then, I || could also have compiled a different package set than he did. || || On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 07:01, Geert Bevin wrote: || > Hi all, || > || > I finally installed 1.0 from scratch and decided to try it out with = gcc || > 3.0.4 instead of 2.95.3. Along the way I encountered some problems, = but || > surprisingly little. I've fixed everything that needed fixing and sa= dly || > some packages are backwards incompatible. For that reason and for th= e || > ease of maintenance I've created a dedicated gcc 3 profile. || > || > So, for those that want to try this out, just link the default-1.0-g= cc3 || > profile instead of default-1.0 to /etc/make.profile. Note that this = will || > only work for installations from scratch and not for updates since || > applications that link against libstdc++ v2 require the libraries of= gcc || > v2 and not gcc v3. || > || > There are still some packages that don't compile such as galeon and || > openjade, but these will be fixed in a matter of time since I need t= hem || > ;-) Feel free to submit fixes too. || > || > Best regards, || > || > Geert Bevin || > -- || > Geert Bevin Uwyn || > "Use what you need" Lambermontlaan 148 || > http://www.uwyn.com 1030 Brussels || > gbevin@uwyn.com Tel & Fax +32 2 245 41 06 || > || > _______________________________________________ || > gentoo-dev mailing list || > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org || > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev || || Thanks, --=20 Bart Verwilst Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Gent, Belgium