From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <linux-dev@dialectique.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E9352019D72 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 05:01:24 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 91880 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 10:56:34 -0000 Received: from apastourelles-107-1-1-227.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO flux) (80.13.78.227) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 10:56:34 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 80.13.78.227 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:14:04 +0200 From: linux-dev <linux-dev@dialectique.org> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo ppc Message-Id: <20020404131404.759dfbe2.linux-dev@dialectique.org> In-Reply-To: <200204011336.g31Da2D10753@excalibur.skynet.be> References: <20020329085358.GA6437@noir.is.pn> <20020331033826.ED7FA200B11E@chiba.3jane.net> <200204011118.g31BInr19062@riker.skynet.be> <200204011336.g31Da2D10753@excalibur.skynet.be> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>, <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/> X-Archives-Salt: 89106067-2584-4206-abbf-430d63feef11 X-Archives-Hash: 53f286a94354d8555275ea9a4b8c16b9 > does anyone think a separate gentooppc (announce/dev) mailinglist is needed? YES! the testing/bugs/error reports will most likely have a lot of ppc specific causes. to avoid putting a burden on the gentoo-dev or gentoo-user lists, i'd recommend a gentoo-ppc list. this has worked successfully before (at least with debian-ppc). /r