From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from riker.skynet.be (riker.skynet.be [195.238.3.132]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEB120EC978 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:05:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from there (adsl-66486.turboline.skynet.be [217.136.131.182]) by riker.skynet.be (8.11.6/8.11.6/Skynet-OUT-2.16) with SMTP id g2PE0sr27984 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:00:54 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from ) Message-Id: <200203251400.g2PE0sr27984@riker.skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Pieter Van den Abeele To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo ppc Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:59:29 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <200203251235.g2PCZxr07357@riker.skynet.be> <20020325130350.GA24094@noir.is.pn> In-Reply-To: <20020325130350.GA24094@noir.is.pn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 060dfcf6-2204-4632-aba0-0c608a915176 X-Archives-Hash: 560c4d20c5d74aad66d34b9066f4e653 On Monday 25 March 2002 14:03, Kain wrote: > I have already been working on this for about a week. I am actually in > the process of finally building a pmac cdimage.iso as I write this, and > will put up an alterate portage tree in a day or two. that's good news :-) > Also, I doubt that this could be achieved in the near-term, but > gcc-3.0.4 kernels on ppc oops for me under moderate vm load. As far as my experience with gcc3 and kernelcompiles goes, I do not recommend using gcc3* for compiling kernels (neither on x86 or ppc) - at least not until gcc is completely adopted/supported by the kernel-space people. Btw. do all your ppc kernels have this problem? > :( Also, as > far as kernels go, I've managed to make a PPC kernel with XFS support, I > haven't tested anything reiserfs, nor do I really intend to. I'll be testing reiserfs, haven't tried XFS yet...(think I should :-) ) I've never had any real problems using reiserfs on the x86 platform and I do not expect reiserfs to behave incorrectly on ppc. > Expect cdimage.iso/build.tbz2 and a rsyncable portage tree that (mostly) > works for ppc on Tuesday or so. :-) -- Pieter Van den Abeele pvdabeel@vub.ac.be