From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail3.home.nl (mail3.home.nl [213.51.129.227]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2302016097 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 04:16:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from dors.sho ([217.121.131.224]) by mail3.home.nl (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20020313101206.CBSL18796.mail3.home.nl@dors.sho>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:12:06 +0100 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:13:10 +0100 From: P.Gnodde To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Cc: ekarttun@cs.helsinki.fi Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] grsecurity and the gentoo 2.4.18 kernel Message-Id: <20020313111310.589050a8.peter@pcswebdesign.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020313060330.GA13989@shellak.helsinki.fi> References: <20020313060330.GA13989@shellak.helsinki.fi> Organization: PCS Webdesign BV X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: ac91262f-92c2-4374-b83b-77c31011e699 X-Archives-Hash: 93c647c438fbe560d8eb57259118e09c Hi, > The four remaining files are source code > and would need someone with knowledge about > the kernel to fix them. I have the grsecurity patch integrated in the gentoo 2.4.18 kernel and fixed the failed chunks, but I went on patching that tree and now it fails to compile for no apperent reason :). But the kernel with kerneli and grsecurity patches compiled fine, when I tested it. I'll set up another tree and apply grsecurity again and send you an updated patch when I get back from work :). But while fixing the failed chunks, I did notice that there _could_ be some conflicts between POSIX ACLs and grsecurity ACLs, but I do not use ACLs yet, so I would not know if there _are_ conflicts. > Is a kernel with grsecurity patch planned in > the near future? There are some plans about a secure gentoo profile, read back in the archives :). Regards, Peter Gnodde