From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from dixiesys.com (www.dixiesys.com [216.40.203.11]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556FA201CECF for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 06:14:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from trapper_keeper.lycanthro.lab (ppp1.lycanthrolabs.com [208.225.67.125] (may be forged)) by www.dixiesys.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g2DCAu910631 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 06:10:57 -0600 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:24:47 -0500 From: "K.L. Davis" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel 2.4.18 patches Message-Id: <20020313072447.3a82753a.kdavis@nanux.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd4.5) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 432aabec-d12d-4876-a312-c54e58aa4393 X-Archives-Hash: b921bc73f5b7d054daa9e20cb954c4ad I can not speak for the gentoo project, but it would be silly to not include the rml patches (although I don't think of them as "fancy pants")... The rml preempt patch has been merged into the official Linux kernel anyway and thus will be part of *all* Linux distros in the not too distant future... Till then, you can always dl and apply the current patch yourself? On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:29:26 +0100 Andreas Waschbuesch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi *, > > I just liked to ask, whether there will be those mr-fancy-pants preempt and > lockbreak patches from rml back in gentoo's actual kernel or not. I'd like to > switch from 2.4.17-r5 and will stick with vanilla + BOTH patches, if it's > clear that they won't be included in the nearer future - which would be quite > sad - by the way. Any plan? > > Thanks in advance - Urs Andrew > > - -- > Andreas Waschbuesch, GAUniversity KG MA FNZ FK01 > eMail: awaschb@gwdg.de > > I think we're in trouble. > -- Han Solo > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE8jyoG2s5UCjOaQbYRAnxJAJ9vCwqBw5awwdBg4JfOpXOXeHDhYwCeP5HC > 9rBfwZvXzGuplXUtiAOZJ94= > =ZVee > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >