From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mxout1.netvision.net.il (mxout1.netvision.net.il [194.90.9.20]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6322015DDA for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:28:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from laptop.dan.net ([62.0.84.165]) by mxout1.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built Sep 5 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GSI006NUINLI7@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 20:14:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 20:13:22 +0200 From: Dan Armak Subject: Re: Ebuild freeze (was: [gentoo-dev] wine 20020228) In-reply-to: <1015258728.12552.9.camel@workshop.saharact.lan> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-id: <200203051849.31011.danarmak@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.99] Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-8-i Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20020304142156.GOHR10886.mf1@there> <1015258213.7995.97.camel@inventor.gentoo.org> <1015258728.12552.9.camel@workshop.saharact.lan> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: fa98ec3e-b929-46b2-91ea-2be96db6a5ca X-Archives-Hash: 7cdf2f0103ff2480711bd4b50ad537db On Monday 04 March 2002 18:18, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 18:10, Daniel Robbins wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 08:41, Arcady Genkin wrote: > > > Per Wigren writes: > > > > Just a note: > > > > I did a: > > > > # cp wine-20020122.ebuild wine-20020228.ebuild > > > > and it works fine! > > > > > > Isn't it too bad that ebuild freeze is in effect? ;^) > > > > > > Having re-read the announcement, though, it's not clear to me whether > > > new versions of existing portages are subject to the freeze, or only > > > the newly submitted ebuilds... > > > > > > Clarification, anyone? > > > > The main purpose of the ebuild freeze is to free up developer time. If > > you have some free time and want to update a few ebuilds, that's fine -- > > as long as you ensure the new versions work. > > And if you do decide to update it ... maybe move it to /usr ? :) > I already did that when I wrote the abovementioned 20020122 ebuild recently :-) It's masked, but I'll unmask it now since people have confirmed it works. -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team (KDE) Matan, Israel