From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DMARC_QUAR, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from no-spam.it.helsinki.fi (NO-SPAM.it.helsinki.fi [128.214.205.34]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8062200CA72 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:08:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from mat-153.math.helsinki.fi (mat-153.math.helsinki.fi [128.214.72.113]) by no-spam.it.helsinki.fi (8.11.4/8.11.4-SPAMmers-sod-off) with ESMTP id g2565B420600 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 08:05:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from ekarttun by mat-153.math.helsinki.fi with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16i81j-0003DK-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 08:02:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 08:02:19 +0200 From: Einar Karttunen To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for an unstable branch Message-ID: <20020305060219.GA7463@shellak.helsinki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20020304064134.GB17581@shellak.helsinki.fi> <3C83C60A.6080305@btinternet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C83C60A.6080305@btinternet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: e65dd62a-b4e6-42f5-9c3d-91f943652f2a X-Archives-Hash: 5aa3cd00a2177ce804ab440cec4f489d On 04.03.02 19:07 +0000(+0000), ian.c.smith@btinternet.com wrote: > > Why not just unmask the ebuilds you are interested in? The problem is that the current system (submitting ebuilds via bugzilla) is too slow and requires too much effort from the developers, for a unstable branch. - Einar Karttunen