From: George Shapovalov <georges@its.caltech.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage on dial-up connection?
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 10:35:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200203031828.KAA27780@chamber.cco.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16hTbS-00051L-00.2002-03-03-10-52-31@mail18.svr.pol.co.uk>
Hi
I am using gentoo largely with a dialup connection at home (too lazy to bring
laptop to the lab at the times :-)). I must say, that I find gentoo the most
"dial-up" frendly distribution. Not that it preferes dial-up over broadband
of course :-), but it makes it possible to use it as dial-up only.
emerge rsync takes usually just a few minutes (after original one, which
would take 1-2 hrs, but you can just grub latest portage tree (tbz2 file
which is 4MB instead of ~20MB uncompressed) and untar it to /usr/portage).
It can resumae after disconnects if you emerge prozilla and modify
/etc/make.conf to make use of it.
Downloading large stuff (kernel/glibc/kde...) takes a long time, but the same
does its compilation. Just do it overnight. You don't have to coach this
process, so in the end this distro saves your time.
If you have broadband somwhere else, you can just grab necessary sources and
place them to /usr/portage/distfiles (this is where they end up anyways). If
you have a few computers and don't want to duplicate all that just nfs-export
this directory (or the whole portage or even /usr, depending on what you have
in mind).
So in short, yes it is definitely possible and actually even easier than
with other distributions. If they would only parallelize source fetching and
compilation..., but this is on TODO list I beleive.
George
On Sunday 03 March 2002 02:51, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a quick query about Gentoo/Portage:
>
> Is it possible to use Portage with a standard (and pretty slow) PPP dial-up
> modem connection (ie. 56K)? Does Portage support resume of broken
> downloads?
>
> I have a free dial-up internet connection which (annoyingly) disconnects
> itself after every 2 hours of being connected, and would like to give
> Gentoo a try, as I have so far not been completely satisfied with the
> various binary distributions I've tried and their package management
> systems. I am also a self-confessed optimisation fanatic :-)
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sami Knudsen Al-Sayed
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-03 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-03 10:51 [gentoo-dev] Portage on dial-up connection? Sami Al-Sayed
2002-03-03 18:35 ` George Shapovalov [this message]
2002-03-03 20:53 ` ian.c.smith
2002-03-03 23:51 ` Dan Armak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200203031828.KAA27780@chamber.cco.caltech.edu \
--to=georges@its.caltech.edu \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox