From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A772015DB6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:51:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from fwd05.sul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16dTq2-0004J0-09; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:19:02 +0100 Received: from portal.mydomain (520069246894-0001@[217.82.196.149]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16dTpv-0oB9KyC; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:18:55 +0100 Received: (qmail 26034 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 11:19:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mouse.mydomain) (192.168.1.12) by portal.mydomain with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 11:19:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1586 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Feb 2002 10:18:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:18:44 +0100 From: Gert Menke To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] prefix overide portage Message-ID: <20020220101844.GA1554@mouse.mydomain> References: <87r8ngd9uf.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> <20020220070237.GA3364@zad.att.ne.jp> <1014199668.5067.17.camel@kodiak.chronospace.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1014199668.5067.17.camel@kodiak.chronospace.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i X-Sender: 520069246894-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 89b9b7a7-63b8-411d-bf5d-3b8accf02d99 X-Archives-Hash: 1c4e30d6c8e9585cc6d812c1c45e2dd2 Hi, On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:07:48AM -0500, Bruce A. Locke wrote: > On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 02:02, Matt Doughty wrote: > > I personally would like to leave /bin,/sbin,/lib /usr/bin,/usr/lib, > > and /usr/sbin alone after the initial bootstrap. I don't want > > optional packages to intermingle in the same file space as those > > that are needed for the system to function. The files that are needed for the system to run should not be in /usr at all. System files go to /bin, /lib, /sbin, etc. /usr contains the applications for, well, the users. Probably just my personal preferences. Greetings Gert