From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mx0.dataguard.no (mx0.dataguard.no [212.62.224.13]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 415F82584B for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:59:56 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 70263 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 15:00:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monster.dataguard.no) (212.62.224.2) by mx0.dataguard.no with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 15:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 14238 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 15:00:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO elysium.outsiders.net) (193.216.52.204) by hotel.dataguard.no with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 15:00:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:00:54 +0100 From: Joachim Blaabjerg To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? Message-Id: <20020110160054.5f8b903b.styx@SuxOS.org> In-Reply-To: <1010673640.2290.20.camel@fluffy> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> <20020110145129.4453cc69.styx@SuxOS.org> <1010673640.2290.20.camel@fluffy> Organization: www.SuxOS.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 23ed6c16-690a-4f1b-9dbd-19c7db9cb0f0 X-Archives-Hash: 490c9d192a40ed28c0c33a86f4b1a83b On 10 Jan 2002 15:40:40 +0100 Mikael Hallendal wrote: > > Nice! I know ;) > > We don't want to add this to all ebuilds not supporting the > secure-stuff. This will be very hard and unmaintainable. Better would be > to create a profile which includes packages and version and then use > that profile for the secured version (thus not making it possible to > install any other packages). Ah, okay, I see... But what do you think, will there be a USE variable, or something else? -- Joachim Blaabjerg styx@SuxOS.org www.SuxOS.org