From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix, from userid 1105) id B2E7F24923; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:28:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:28:53 -0600 From: Daniel Robbins To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuilds for kde3 beta etc. Message-ID: <20011222112853.B27239@chiba.3jane.net> References: <0GOR009629L95F@mxout2.netvision.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0GOR009629L95F@mxout2.netvision.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: aab9298c-0818-4bfe-8d4b-54bc8e0d036e X-Archives-Hash: d4bd03ab5c690a9103903be46c6acab3 On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm working on the (final) depend.eclass version selection routine. I should > finish it today and then I'll move on to writing ebuilds for kde3-beta1 and > later kde3 cvs[up], which I'll put on some site for people like e.g. woodchip > (who is working on this too from some angle) et al to use/test. So when we > come to kde3 final we'll have long-used, well-tested ebuilds right away :-) > > A few Qs: > > 1. If the FHS say only binary stuff goes in /opt, where would I put several > KDEs-in-testing? /usr/kde-$ver? Whatever makes sense; just don't use /opt. > 2. Where should I put these ebuilds (as patches to portage)? I curently have > no personal site; I could use sourceforge or something similar, but a > collection of packages for a distribution doesn't really seem to fit > sourceforge's purposes (marginally). Maybe we should just put them on > gentoo.org somewhere? After all, they won't be at all large. Or just do cvs > branches :-) Can you just put them on Portage and add them to package.mask? -- Daniel Robbins Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc.