From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp-2.enteract.com (smtp-2.enteract.com [207.229.143.4]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DF615A3D for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:52:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (shell-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.40]) by smtp-2.enteract.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530B15F6D; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:52:46 -0600 (CST) Received: (from tchan@localhost) by shell-1.enteract.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id fBF7qjX55577; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:52:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tchan) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:52:45 -0600 From: Terry Chan To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20011215015245.A55484@enteract.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Subject: [gentoo-dev] Possible portage 1.7.7 bug?? Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 53e66d84-30f2-4cc3-94d7-ac472abda524 X-Archives-Hash: 3aea0dcec711d91b9e610b63ccf1209f Hi, When using portage 1.7.7 try this to test for a possible bug in deciding latest versions of package names again: emerge net-misc/openssh Portage chooses openssh-3.0_p1-r6, but there are at least two other ebuilds that are greater than this, namely openssh-3.0.1_p1 and openssh-3.0.2_p1 openssh is not in package.mask, so I don't think that is part of this problem. Is this a real bug? Am I interpreting the ebuild names incorrectly? Terry Chan