From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <drobbins@chiba.3jane.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=4.0.0
Received: by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix, from userid 1105)
	id 7AF94189B9; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:17:18 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:17:18 -0600
From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sandbox suggestion
Message-ID: <20011211141718.G27430@chiba.3jane.net>
References: <E16Deth-0005Et-00@granger.mail.mindspring.net> <3C164AAA.3010007@shaw.ca> <1008095033.1061.0.camel@willow.theleaf.office> <E16DsTc-00065A-00@granger.mail.mindspring.net> <20011211140411.F27430@chiba.3jane.net> <3C1669A3.9000807@shaw.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C1669A3.9000807@shaw.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc.
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Developer discussion list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: ad901521-916e-459e-b69d-acf6a182e3ba
X-Archives-Hash: 100673f0769287932ef6494b33410f47

On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:16:35PM -0800, Zach Forrest wrote:
> Where is the best place to discuss testing type issues?

> >>Perhaps gentoo policy could be to make ebuilds reference:
> >>
> >>#!/bin/ebuild-bash

What you are suggesting is not a "testing type" issue.  If you'd like to
discuss the current implementation of path sandboxing, this is the place.  But
we will handle the integration of sandboxing into Gentoo Linux proper,
including all the sub-issues that this raises.

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins                                  <drobbins@gentoo.org>
Chief Architect/President                       http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.